Development, field testing, and implementation of improved bridge parapet designs.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Development, field testing, and implementation of improved bridge parapet designs.

Filetype[PDF-3.29 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      A total of 22 test parapets was constructed as part of this project to evaluate different approaches to address

      premature cracking. The experiments included the use of deeper saw cuts through glass fiber reinforced polymer

      (GFRP) reinforcement or field cut steel reinforcement, with the saw cut depth increased from 1 ½ inches (38 mm)

      to 3 ½ inches (89 mm). Another experimental modification was the use of polypropylene fibers in the mixture at

      two different dosage rates, 1 lb/yd3 (0.59 kg/m3) and 2 lb/yd3 (1.19 kg/m3). The research team monitored bridge

      parapets during and immediately after construction. This included instrumentation with embedded maturity

      sensors to capture temperature history of the parapets, using Command Center technology. Researchers also

      observed and documented parapet construction. It was important to note any constructability issues that may

      arise that may be related to the proposed solutions, since they would potentially impact the cost of

      implementation. Crack surveys were performed once formwork was removed and sawcutting had been

      completed. The stiffness gain of parapets and joint cracking were monitored using ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV)

      technology. While all of the eight control bridges showed mid-panel cracking, only four of the twelve experimental

      bridges had mid-panel cracking. Both parapets with Vandal Protection Fence (VPF) posts showed cracks near the

      posts. The main purpose of using GFRP or field cut steel reinforcement with the 3.5 inch (89 mm) deep saw cut is

      to create a weakened plane at the control joint through the gap provided in the reinforcement, in order initiate

      cracking at the joints and reduce the risk of cracking elsewhere on the parapet. From the data gathered, this

      modification allowed more joints to crack at early stages, and prevented uncontrolled cracking. The parapets with

      fibers showed no measurable improvement over the parapets without fibers in regards to preventing shrinkage

      and temperature cracking. Reducing the joint spacing over negative tension areas was found to reduce

      uncontrolled bridge parapet cracking. However, since the experimental parapets with the reduced joint spacing

      were coupled with another modification of either the polypropylene fibers or the deeper saw cut, it was hard to

      determine if this alone would solve uncontrolled bridge parapet cracking.

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26