Verification of abutment and retaining wall design assumptions.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


Verification of abutment and retaining wall design assumptions.

Filetype[PDF-3.67 MB]

  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), along with some other federal and state guidelines,

      suggest a maximum soil fines (particles finer than 0.075 mm) content in granular structural backfill be used behind bridge abutments and retaining

      walls. This fines content limit is currently set at 6 percent (by weight) by the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) and is usually between 5

      and 12 percent in most states, according to a canvassing of state Department of Transportation (DOT) practices. The fines content limit is an

      attempt to assure a free-draining backfill condition so water is not retained behind the structure, thereby eliminating the need to design the

      abutments and retaining walls for hydrostatic pressures. It appears that this maximum fines content is adopted largely as a rule-of-thumb

      considering that hydraulic conductivity of a soil is expected to decrease with increasing fines content. In Vermont and many other regions the

      availability of high-quality structural backfill with naturally low fines content is declining, which warrants an evaluation of whether granular backfill

      materials with greater than 5% fines content could be successfully used in practice.

      This research project was set up with two broad over-arching goals. The first goal was to verify that the backfill and drainage details currently

      used in cast-in-place concrete cantilevered retaining walls and bridge abutments on VTrans projects perform as expected and that the backfill has

      the engineering properties assumed in the design. The second goal was to find the most cost effective backfill details. To evaluate the above two

      overarching goals, the specific objectives of this research were to: (1) survey other state Departments of Transportation on their practices for

      abutment and retaining walls; (2) study the effects of fines on a typical granular structural backfill by performing hydraulic conductivity and shear

      strength tests at varied non-plastic fines contents; (3) monitor differential water levels between the stream and the backfill at two field sites; (4)

      analyze the collected data and develop specific recommendations for VTrans; and (5) prepare this final report.

      To assess if any differential water pressures exist in existing cast-in-place reinforced concrete retaining walls installed by VTrans, a field

      monitoring program was implemented at two sites in Vermont. The laboratory investigation included flexible wall, hydraulic conductivity tests on a

      granular structural backfill with 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25% non-plastic fines content at 41, 83, and 124 kPa (6, 12, and 18 psi) confining pressures

      followed by consolidated drained triaxial compression tests for obtaining associated drained shear strength parameters of these gradations. The

      15.2 cm (6 in.) diameter specimens were prepared at optimum moisture content and 95% of maximum standard Proctor density. Some tests were

      conducted at 90% of maximum standard Proctor density. To enable a comparison with respect to modified Proctor maximum densities, modified

      Proctor tests were also performed for all base soil-fines content mixtures. The experimental results were compared with relevant studies found in

      the literature.

      The results of the field monitoring program were inconclusive. The results of the laboratory investigation indicated that a non-plastic fines

      content up to 10% may be justified in structural backfill specifications for retaining walls and abutments.

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at

    Version 3.26