Welcome to ROSA P |
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
Roadway sampling evaluation.
  • Published Date:
    2014-09-01
  • Language:
    English
Filetype[PDF-1.89 MB]


Details:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Abstract:
    The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has traditionally required that all sampling and testing of asphalt mixtures be at the Contractor’s production facility. With recent staffing cuts, as well as budget reductions, FDOT has been considering alternative sampling methods which will provide greater staffing flexibility, while at the same time provide assurance that a quality product is placed on the roadway. One of the methods being considered is sampling the asphalt mixture at the roadway. The first objective of this study was to conduct a literature review and survey which included interviewing various transportation engineers to determine which agencies require, or allow, field sampling for acceptance and whether those efforts have been successful. The second objective of this study was to evaluate the sampling and testing variability of samples taken at the plant compared to those taken from the roadway mat and from the paver auger. A statistical evaluation was performed to compare results from this study to the specification limits currently being used. Superpave 9.5 mm and 12.5 mm mixes were sampled on 11 dense-graded projects, and two FC-5 projects (Open-Graded mix) were sampled and tested. The survey showed as many agencies require sampling from the roadway as require sampling from the plant; but when agencies allow either location, samples are most often taken from a loaded truck at the plant. When roadway samples are taken, most often those samples are taken from the mat behind the paver. For dense-graded mixes, individual test tolerances for air voids, and Gmm and Gmb values of limestone mixes will need to be increased if roadway samples are to be used for acceptance or comparison with contractor results. The differences for percent passing the No. 200 sieve were statistically significant for auger samples, but deviations were within current tolerances. Asphalt content was significantly affected by roadway mat samples, but deviations were within current tolerances. Roadway samples of FC-5 mix from both the mat and auger were statistically different than the contractor and FDOT samples taken at the plant. Roadway sampling is not recommended for FC-5 mixes.
  • Format:
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Supporting Files:
    No Additional Files
No Related Documents.
You May Also Like: