Roadway sampling evaluation.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


Roadway sampling evaluation.

Filetype[PDF-1.89 MB]

  • English

  • Details:

    • Corporate Contributors:
    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has traditionally required that all sampling

      and testing of asphalt mixtures be at the Contractor’s production facility. With recent staffing cuts, as

      well as budget reductions, FDOT has been considering alternative sampling methods which will

      provide greater staffing flexibility, while at the same time provide assurance that a quality product is

      placed on the roadway. One of the methods being considered is sampling the asphalt mixture at the


      The first objective of this study was to conduct a literature review and survey which included

      interviewing various transportation engineers to determine which agencies require, or allow, field

      sampling for acceptance and whether those efforts have been successful. The second objective of this

      study was to evaluate the sampling and testing variability of samples taken at the plant compared to

      those taken from the roadway mat and from the paver auger. A statistical evaluation was performed

      to compare results from this study to the specification limits currently being used. Superpave 9.5 mm

      and 12.5 mm mixes were sampled on 11 dense-graded projects, and two FC-5 projects (Open-Graded

      mix) were sampled and tested.

      The survey showed as many agencies require sampling from the roadway as require sampling

      from the plant; but when agencies allow either location, samples are most often taken from a loaded

      truck at the plant. When roadway samples are taken, most often those samples are taken from the

      mat behind the paver.

      For dense-graded mixes, individual test tolerances for air voids, and Gmm and Gmb values of

      limestone mixes will need to be increased if roadway samples are to be used for acceptance or

      comparison with contractor results. The differences for percent passing the No. 200 sieve were

      statistically significant for auger samples, but deviations were within current tolerances. Asphalt

      content was significantly affected by roadway mat samples, but deviations were within current

      tolerances. Roadway samples of FC-5 mix from both the mat and auger were statistically different

      than the contractor and FDOT samples taken at the plant. Roadway sampling is not recommended for

      FC-5 mixes.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at

    Version 3.26