U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Risk-based bridge inspection practices.

File Language:
English


Select the Download button to view the document
Please click the download button to view the document.

Details

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    Improving bridge safety, reliability, and the allocation of bridge inspection resources are the goals of the proposed risk‐based bridge 

    inspection practices. Currently, most bridges in the United States are inspected at a fixed calendar interval of 24 months, without regard 

    to the  condition  of the  bridge.  Newer  bridges  with  little  or  no  damage  are  inspected  with the same  frequency  as  older,  more 

    deteriorated bridges thus creating inefficiency in the allocation of inspection resources. 

     

    The proposed methodology incorporates reliability theory and expert elicitation from the Indiana Department of Transportation’s Risk 

    Assessment Panel, developed during this research, to rationally determine bridge inspection needs. Assessments are made based on the 

    likelihood and consequence of failure for specific bridge components. The likelihood of failure is determined through attributes based on 

    design, loading, and condition characteristics while the consequence of failure is based on expected structural capacity, public safety, 

    and serviceability. By combining the expressions of likelihood and consequence for each component, an optimum inspection interval for 

    the entire bridge can be determined through the use of risk matrices. 

     

    The methodology was evaluated through case studies involving Indiana bridges. Over 30 years of historical inspection reports were 

    utilized in the back‐casting process to evaluate deterioration levels and assess the adequacy of the risk criteria. Results of the case 

    studies conducted during the research indicated that the risk analysis procedures provided suitable inspection intervals ranging from 24 

    to 72 months for Indiana bridges. 

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha256:10c9df16a85016ca5c016de4e6e960f350c00294bc456b6338a57cb6a2566f4c
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 37.46 MB ]
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.