Data collection and evaluation of continuity detail for John James Audubon Bridge No. 61390613004101.
-
2014-10-01
Details
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:This report summarizes findings from monitoring data that was collected over a two-year period from Bridge No. ; 61390613004101 in the John James Audubon Project, which was formerly designated as Bridge #2 prior to ; construction completion. The bridge was instrumented as part of an earlier project (LTRC Project No. 08-1ST). ; Results from the first monitoring project warranted resuming data collection to monitor the performance of Bridge ; No. 61390613004101 over a longer period of time. The focus of the monitoring effort for both projects is on the ; employed continuity detail, which is based on the recommendation of the National Cooperative Highway Research ; Program (NCHRP) Final Report 519. Continuity details are typically used to eliminate the needs for high-maintenance joints that often lead to the acceleration of element deterioration near the joints. The employed ; positive moment continuity detail transfers forces between adjacent girders via positive moment reinforcement that ; extends out of the bottom flanges of the prestressed concrete (PSC) girders into a continuity diaphragm. ; The 96-channel monitoring system that was installed as part of Project 08-1ST was reactivated in February 2012. ; Data from the embedded and surface-mounted sensors that measure strains, temperatures, rotations, and gap ; openings in critical locations in the monitored segment were collected for a period of two years. The collected data ; from both projects (12-1ST and 08-1ST) was analyzed and interpreted. Furthermore, four field visits were ; conducted to document the condition of the girder ends in the monitored segment. ; Recommendations based on the project findings are drawn. Data shows that 5 years after the construction of the ; bridge, some long-term effects such as creep and shrinkage have diminished. It is also evident that temperature ; effects are still a major factor that continues to strain the bridge in such a way that should not be ignored in the ; design of bridges with similar continuity details. The high-localized strains at girder ends due to thermal variation ; caused cracking in a few girder ends.
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:f240d69822e9ce42a122d4144a02642d1a287d9feca2d1e1e1704ac486c0a4482dd16a88df87c1e85f4065588ab30a21707151ec40540c191553f32fa557d1a9