Assessment of ASTM D 6690-12 type II and type IV joint sealers.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Assessment of ASTM D 6690-12 type II and type IV joint sealers.

Filetype[PDF-1.21 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      To address the issue of water infiltration and debris retention, bi

      tuminous crack sealers and fillers have been

      developed to help prevent premature pavement distress. If applied appropriately, crack sealers and fillers can

      significantly extend the life of a pavement. To utilize crack sealers and fillers properly, one mu

      st understand that

      sealers and fillers differ in application and material types. Crack sealers are typically used on cracks that move

      more than one

      -

      eighth inch, with the intention to prevent water and debris from entering the pavement structure.

      The rigo

      rous installation process involves thorough crack preparation followed by placement of high elongation

      material in a specific configuration. Crack fillers generally use a stiffer material than crack sealers and are typically

      used on non

      -

      working cracks

      The

      purpose of this study was to examine and evaluate the constructability, overall performance and cost

      effectiveness of AASHTO M324

      -

      12 Type II versus IV Joint Sealers. Research personnel assessed each product’s

      durability at each location. Cracks were fil

      led according to the project plans. Efforts were made to provide a

      comparative analysis with regard to performance and cost of both material types by minimizing application

      variations in weather conditions, equipment used, and application crewmembers by a

      pplying material on the same

      day and/or conditions.

      Over a

      three

      -

      year

      span and six data collection timeframes, the type IV material resulted in an average of a

      10% less allowance of water passage through the length of a filled crack. A ten percent better

      performance of a

      material over a comparable alternative is considerable and should not be ignored, and results in approximately 2

      feet less of compromised length of a full width transverse crack

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26