Relative Operational Performance of Geosynthetics Used as Subgrade Stabilization
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Relative Operational Performance of Geosynthetics Used as Subgrade Stabilization

Filetype[PDF-63.47 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
English
Details Related Documents You May Also Like

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
    Western Transportation Institute
  • Corporate Contributors:
    United States. Federal Highway Administration
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
    FHWA/MT-14-002/7712-251
  • DOI:
  • Resource Type:
    Tech Report
  • Geographical Coverage:
    Montana
  • Corporate Publisher:
    Montana. Dept. of Transportation. Research Programs
  • Abstract:
    Full-scale test sections were constructed, trafficked and monitored to compare the relative operational performance of geosynthetics used as subgrade stabilization as well as determine which material properties are most related to performance. Seventeen, 50-ft. long test sections were constructed – fourteen containing geosynthetic reinforcement and three without. A subgrade material was prepared and constructed to an average strength of 1.79 CBR with the exception of two reinforced test sections which were constructed to greater and lesser strengths in order to determine the effect subgrade strength had on the performance of the test sections. The test sections were constructed with an average base course thickness of 10.9 in. with the exception of two controls where the base thickness was intentionally increased to evaluate the effect of base thickness on test section performance. Information from the test sections that were purposely constructed with different subgrade strength and base course thickness were used to correct any variability in the remaining reinforced test sections. Test sections were trafficked using a 45-kip, 3-axle dump truck. Rut, displacement, strain, and pore-water pressure were monitored during trafficking. Post-trafficking excavations were conducted to evaluate damage to the geosynthetic, base contamination from the subgrade, and strength and deformation of the layers. Longitudinal rut was the primary indicator of performance. Geosynthetic material properties were used in a linear regression analysis to determine which properties best related to performance of the test sections in this study as well as test sections from Phase I. It was determined that the strength and stiffness of the junctions and tensile strength properties in the cross-machine direction correlated well with performance. The woven and non-Full-scale test sections were constructed, trafficked and monitored to compare the relative operational performance of geosynthetics used as subgrade stabilization as well as determine which material properties are most related to performance. Seventeen, 50-ft. long test sections were constructed – fourteen containing geosynthetic reinforcement and three without. A subgrade material was prepared and constructed to an average strength of 1.79 CBR with the exception of two reinforced test sections which were constructed to greater and lesser strengths in order to determine the effect subgrade strength had on the performance of the test sections. The test sections were constructed with an average base course thickness of 10.9 in. with the exception of two controls where the base thickness was intentionally increased to evaluate the effect of base thickness on test section performance. Information from the test sections that were purposely constructed with different subgrade strength and base course thickness were used to correct any variability in the remaining reinforced test sections. Test sections were trafficked using a 45-kip, 3-axle dump truck. Rut, displacement, strain, and pore-water pressure were monitored during trafficking. Post-trafficking excavations were conducted to evaluate damage to the geosynthetic, base contamination from the subgrade, and strength and deformation of the layers. Longitudinal rut was the primary indicator of performance. Geosynthetic material properties were used in a linear regression analysis to determine which properties best related to performance of the test sections in this study as well as test sections from Phase I. It was determined that the strength and stiffness of the junctions and tensile strength properties in the cross-machine direction correlated well with performance.
  • Content Notes:
    Additional information may be found at: https://www.pooledfund.org/Details/Study/479
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Alternate URL:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

Related Documents

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov