Deicer usage on concrete and asphalt pavements in Utah.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Deicer usage on concrete and asphalt pavements in Utah.

Filetype[PDF-1.74 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Corporate Publisher:
    • Abstract:
      The objectives of this research were to 1) compile winter maintenance data for the Utah Department of

      Transportation (UDOT) to directly compare concrete and asphalt pavements with regards to deicer usage and 2)

      determine if there is a statistical difference in deicer usage on concrete and asphalt pavements. To this end, three

      data sources were consulted for this research: Maintenance Management Quality Assurance (MMQA) database,

      UDOT road database, and Google Maps. The final compiled data set prepared for analysis in this research

      contained deicer quantities by deicer type, pavement surface areas by pavement material type, traffic, longitude,

      latitude, and elevation data. The deicer data evaluated in this analysis represented the total quantities of each deicer

      distributed during the 8-year period during which the MMQA database was used by UDOT.

      Several multiple linear regression analyses were performed to determine if concrete or asphalt pavements

      required different amounts of deicers, including salt, Redmond salt, brine, wetted salt, magnesium chloride, sand,

      pre-mix, and wetted pre-mix, during the winter seasons evaluated in this research. From the results of the statistical

      analyses, concrete proportion was statistically significant in models for three of the dependent variables, including

      brine, wetted salt, and wetted pre-mix. However, neither the full nor the reduced regression model prepared for the

      sum of all deicers had concrete proportion as one of the significant variables. The absence of concrete proportion as

      an independent variable in these models shows that, on average, after correcting for differences in traffic volume and

      pavement area, deicer usage in Utah is not affected by pavement type. Therefore, except in areas where applications

      of brine, wetted salt, and wetted pre-mix are common, winter maintenance costs should not be a factor in the

      determination of pavement type.

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26