Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Determining a strategy for efficiently managing sign retroreflectivity in New Hampshire.

Filetype[PDF-2.09 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) has developed minimum retroreflectivity requirements for sign sheeting that will

      become a federal mandate for roadside signs in 2015 and for overhead signs in 2018. In 2012, the New Hampshire Department of

      Transportation (NHDOT) was required by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to have a plan in place for meeting these requirements.

      The MUTCD has identified five acceptable methods that fall into two categories for determining if signs meet the requirements. In the

      Assessment category, the methods listed are Visual Nighttime Inspection and Measured Sign Retroreflectivity. In the Management category, the

      methods listed are Expected Sign Life, Blanket Replacement, and Control Signs.

      This project focused on determining a method that was most suited to the needs of the NHDOT. Each method has advantages and

      disadvantages that were considered during the selection of an appropriate plan.

      Once all the methods were assessed, it was determined that Visual Nighttime Inspection would be the most economical due to the quickness that

      the review can be accomplished and the minimal resources required to conduct the inspection. Another major factor for selecting the visual

      night inspection was that a statewide sign inventory is currently not available. If a current inventory was available, other methods may prove to

      be more efficient.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26