Methods for excluding cliff swallows from nesting on highway structures.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Methods for excluding cliff swallows from nesting on highway structures.

Filetype[PDF-1.50 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      Cliff swallows (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) are colonially breeding migratory birds that frequently nest on highway

      structures. Protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, nesting control methods cannot harm swallows or active

      nests. This causes problems and delays for structures and maintenance divisions of many departments of transportation.

      Two aversion strategies, bioacoustic deterrents and surface modifications, were evaluated for their effect on cliff swallow

      nesting behavior. The bioacoustic deterrents (BC) consisted of sonic devices that broadcast 8 unique recordings of alarm

      and distress calls. Surface modification consisted of plastic sheeting with a low coefficient of friction. In year 1, surface

      modifications with high density polyethylene (HDPE) sheeting were mounted on the vertical surfaces at typical nesting

      locations. Twenty-eight bridges in the Sacramento Valley of California were used to test the aversion strategies, using a 22

      factorial design with 7 replicates. In year 2, silicone-based paint and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE, commonly called

      Teflon) sheeting were evaluated as surface modifications. Nine bridges were divided into three treatment groups: control

      (no treatment), silicone paint, and PTFE. In year 3, 15 bridges were divided into three treatment groups: control (no

      treatment), PTFE, and PTFE+BC. Each year, completed nests were counted on a weekly basis for several months. In year 1,

      both broadcast calls and HDPE treatments reduced the number of nests built at a site, but neither treatment nor the

      combination completely stopped nesting. In year 2, swallows were able to complete nests on silicone paint, but did not

      successfully complete any nests on PTFE. Silicone paint was determined to be an ineffective surface modification. In year

      3, nests were completed at all control sites, and several PTFE and PTFE+BC sites. Nests built at sites with PTFE or

      PTFE+BC were never started on the PTFE sheeting itself, but instead on the bare concrete and next to the sheeting or at a

      location where sheeting had peeled away from the surface. Altogether, these tests indicated that only PTFE was wholly

      effective in preventing cliff swallows from building on a treated surface, however nests were still completed at non-covered

      locations on the bridge surface or at locations of failed sheeting attachment. Broadcast calls (BC) reduced the number of

      completed nests by delaying the onset of building, but did not stop nest construction altogether.

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26