Adu-Gyamfi, K. O., Zofka, A., & Mahoney, J. (2012). Performance comparison of PG 64-22 versus PG 64-28 asphalt in hot mix asphalt placed in Connecticut (Report No. CT-2264-F-12-7). Connecticut. Dept. of Transportation. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/27220
Adu-Gyamfi, Kwasi Owusu, Adam Zofka, and James Mahoney. Performance comparison of PG 64-22 versus PG 64-28 asphalt in hot mix asphalt placed in Connecticut. Report no. CT-2264-F-12-7. Connecticut. Dept. of Transportation, 2012. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/27220.
Adu-Gyamfi, Kwasi Owusu, et al. Performance comparison of PG 64-22 versus PG 64-28 asphalt in hot mix asphalt placed in Connecticut. Connecticut. Dept. of Transportation, 2012, Report no. CT-2264-F-12-7, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/27220.
This research was conducted to determine if switching from a low-temperature asphalt performance grade
;
(PG) of -28°C to -22°C would be detrimental to the performance of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) pavements in
;
Connecticut. Test sections were placed on two different resurfacing projects in CT in 2006, employing
;
both PG 64-22 and PG 64-28 asphalt binders. Field tests and performance observations along with
;
laboratory analysis and tests were used to determine the feasibility of increasing the cold temperature PG
;
grade. The analysis was conducted utilizing several different methods, including field visits, photolog
;
analysis, International Roughness Index (IRI) analysis, rutting analysis, cracking and distress analysis.
;
Laboratory analyses included Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA) rut testing, tensile strength ratios, critical
;
cracking temperature, PG grading and relaxation modulus. Results of all analysis and testing are not
;
conclusive enough to make definitive statements regarding the use of PG 64-22 as compared with PG 64-
;
28.
Adu-Gyamfi, K. O., Zofka, A., & Mahoney, J. (2012). Performance comparison of PG 64-22 versus PG 64-28 asphalt in hot mix asphalt placed in Connecticut (Report No. CT-2264-F-12-7). Connecticut. Dept. of Transportation. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/27220
Adu-Gyamfi, Kwasi Owusu, Adam Zofka, and James Mahoney. Performance comparison of PG 64-22 versus PG 64-28 asphalt in hot mix asphalt placed in Connecticut. Report no. CT-2264-F-12-7. Connecticut. Dept. of Transportation, 2012. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/27220.
Adu-Gyamfi, Kwasi Owusu, et al. Performance comparison of PG 64-22 versus PG 64-28 asphalt in hot mix asphalt placed in Connecticut. Connecticut. Dept. of Transportation, 2012, Report no. CT-2264-F-12-7, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/27220.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.