Pipeline Research Council International, & Battelle Memorial Institute. Columbus Laboratories (2013). Development of Dual Field Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) Inspection Technology to Detect Mechanical Damage (Report No. DTPH56-06-T-000016 (Project #203)). United States. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/26756
Pipeline Research Council International and Battelle Memorial Institute. Columbus Laboratories. Development of Dual Field Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) Inspection Technology to Detect Mechanical Damage. Report no. DTPH56-06-T-000016 (Project #203). United States. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 2013. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/26756.
Pipeline Research Council International, et al. Development of Dual Field Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) Inspection Technology to Detect Mechanical Damage. United States. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 2013, Report no. DTPH56-06-T-000016 (Project #203), ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/26756.
This report details the development and testing of a dual magnetization in-line inspection (ILI) tool for detecting mechanical damage in operating pipelines, including the first field trials of a fully operational dual-field magnetic flux leakage (MFL) ILI tool. Augmenting routine MFL corrosion inspection of pipelines using high magnetic fields, this in-line inspection technique detects and assesses mechanical damage using a second lower magnetic field. Nearly all commercially available MFL tools use high magnetic fields to detect and size metal loss such as corrosion. A lower field than commonly applied for detecting metal loss is appropriate for detecting mechanical damage, such as the metallurgical changes caused by impacts from excavation equipment. The lower field is needed to counter the saturation effect of the high magnetic field, which masks and diminishes important components of the signal associated with mechanical damage. At low fields, Tech Report properties such as pipeline chemical composition, grain structure, and fabrication methods can also be detected.
Pipeline Research Council International, & Battelle Memorial Institute. Columbus Laboratories (2013). Development of Dual Field Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) Inspection Technology to Detect Mechanical Damage (Report No. DTPH56-06-T-000016 (Project #203)). United States. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/26756
Pipeline Research Council International and Battelle Memorial Institute. Columbus Laboratories. Development of Dual Field Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) Inspection Technology to Detect Mechanical Damage. Report no. DTPH56-06-T-000016 (Project #203). United States. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 2013. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/26756.
Pipeline Research Council International, et al. Development of Dual Field Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) Inspection Technology to Detect Mechanical Damage. United States. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 2013, Report no. DTPH56-06-T-000016 (Project #203), ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/26756.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.