Evaluation of non-destructive technologies for construction quality control of HMA and PCC pavements in Louisiana.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Evaluation of non-destructive technologies for construction quality control of HMA and PCC pavements in Louisiana.

Filetype[PDF-1.32 MB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    Current roadway quality control and quality acceptance (QC/QA) procedures for the Louisiana Department of Transportation and

    Development (LADOTD) include coring for thickness, density, and air voids in hot mix asphalt (HMA) pavements and thickness and

    compressive strength for Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements. Non-destructive testing (NDT) devices, such as the light weight

    deflectometer (LWD) and the portable seismic pavement analyzer (PSPA), provide a non-destructive and portable means of quick inplace

    determination of pavement properties, resulting in an increase in sampling frequency to supplement coring. Many researchers have

    shown good trends between measurements of the NDTs and other pavement properties, though variability has shown to differ from report

    to report. The PSPA exhibited seismic modulus values of the surface layer with an average coefficient of variation (CoV) of 2 to 15

    percent for repeat collections without moving the apparatus. The PSPA variability increased to a range of 6 to 28 percent if the apparatus

    changed orientation or moved within a close proximity. The LWD exhibited deflections values of the pavement structure with an average

    CoV of 4 to 12 percent for repeat collections without moving the apparatus. The PSPA exhibited project wide seismic modulus values

    with a CoV between 1 and 32 percent. The LWD exhibited project wide deflection values with a CoV between 18 and 55 percent.

    Factors that increased variability include: deterioration of the feet pads, presence of vibrations, placement of a foot into a groove, testing

    close to joints, and temperature. Changing the orientation of the sensors showed to increase the variability of the PSPA measurements;

    however, the variability increase is no different than moving the apparatus within a close proximity. Orientation of the sensors did not

    show to have a bias to measuring parallel or perpendicular to the paving direction. The strength gain measured by the PSPA correlated

    well with the strength gain of laboratory testing for only one of the PCC data sets for this study. The LWD deflections correlated well

    with the FWD deflections, but the back-calculated moduli of the surface layer did not correlate well. No trends were observed between

    the PSPA and LWD. A preliminary sampling procedure was developed for the PSPA as a quality control tool in Louisiana.

  • Format:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov