Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Evaluation of an earth heated bridge deck.

Filetype[PDF-7.75 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Edition:
    Final report.
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    The design, construction, performance and analysis of the first ground heat pipe

    system to heat an entire bridge deck are detailed. Each of the sixty heat pipes in

    this system is comprised of a 6 em (2.4") diameter, 31 m (lOO')_long vertical ground

    evaporator, and a condenser that was forme~ by manifolding 2.5-cm (1") pipe on 15 ~m

    (6") centers to heat 7.6 m2 (82 ft2 ) of deck surface. Ammonia vaporizes in an

    evaporator anytime the encompassing ground is warmer than the bridge deck, and this

    vapor ascends into the condenser section where it releases its heat of vaporization

    to the deck.

    The integration of the heat pipes into the bridge deck did not have a

    significant impact on the bridge construction. The heat pipes increased the deck's

    weekly averaged surface temperature up to l0°C (l8°F), preventing preferential

    freezing of the deck relative to the adjacent road. Sno:w cover duration was decreased·

    by 50% despite a ground temperature of only soc (46°F). The m~n~mum dynamic

    conductance of this system during major heating events appears to be between 8 and 11

    watts per m2 of deck per oc temperature difference between the far-field ground and

    the deck surface. A thermal model was developed to accurately handle the complex •

    dynamic interactions between the heat pipes, the deck, and the ·ground. Parametric:

    studies based on this model were used to formulate a heat pipe system thermal design•

    procedure which is presented in the design manual. The heat pipes accounted fo.r 59% ,

    of the total bridge cost with the evaporators generating 69% of the system's expense;'

    but it wo~ld be economically viable to utilize a few ground source heat pipes to heat

    only the tire tracks and gutters.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov