Water quality implications of culvert repair options : cementitious and polyurea spray-on liners.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Water quality implications of culvert repair options : cementitious and polyurea spray-on liners.

Filetype[PDF-476.52 KB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Edition:
    Final report.
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    Many commonly used culvert rehabilitation technologies entail the use of a resin or coating that cures to form a rigid

    liner within the damaged culvert. However, the potential environmental impacts of leaching or release of contaminants during

    normal installation practices have not been well studied. Evaluations of previous culvert repair operations by the Virginia

    Department of Transportation (VDOT) were conducted for conventional (styrene-based) cured-in-place pipe and fold and form

    repair technologies. The study reported herein included an evaluation of two additional technologies available for use by VDOT:

    a polymer-enhanced cement mortar (or cementitious) spray-on liner and a polyurea spray-on liner.

    To evaluate the potential for these lining technologies to impact water quality, installations were monitored up to 49

    days. Three water quality tests were conducted for each installation, and water samples were analyzed for water quality

    indicators and constituents listed in material safety data sheets. Tests included a water flow simulation with low dilution

    potential; an immersion test to simulate a standing water scenario; and a laboratory leaching test. Results were then compared

    against established regulatory standards and published toxicity criteria for aquatic species.

    For the cementitious spray-on liner evaluated, pH and alkalinity exceeded specified Virginia water standards in

    laboratory tests but pH and other evaluated compounds were within the acceptable range in water flow and immersion tests. For

    the polyurea spray-on liner evaluated, elevated water quality indicators (i.e., biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen

    demand, total organic carbon, and total nitrogen) in laboratory tests suggested that contaminants were released from the polyurea

    liner, particularly during its initial contact with water, but water quality impacts were not detected in the other tests. Water flow,

    dilution, and volatilization appear to play an important role in reducing water quality impacts from contaminant leaching.

    The study recommends that VDOT specifications include protective controls for spray-on liners to prevent exceeding

    water quality standards or toxicity thresholds for aquatic species in receiving waters with low flows and little dilution potential.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov