U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

AASHTO mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide parametric study.

File Language:
English


Details

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    This study focuses on assessing the robustness of the AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG v 1.1) for rigid pavement

    design projects in Wisconsin. The primary tasks conducted in this study included performing sensitivity analysis on MEPDG’s inputs for jointed

    plain concrete pavement (JPCP) design, evaluating the practicality of each input parameter’s sensitivity, determining the effects of using different

    concrete materials and different hierarchical levels of inputs on predicted JPCP performances, and identifying the limitations of the current MEPDG.

    It was found that the coefficient of thermal expansion and modulus of rupture had a strong impact on MEPDG predictions and these outcomes

    appeared consistent with conventional wisdom. The adverse effects of the concrete unit weight and the positive benefits of the widened concrete slab

    were suspected to have been overestimated by the MEPDG. It was verified that MEPDG predictions were significantly different depending on the

    concrete materials and hierarchical levels of inputs chosen. Therefore, the pavement designer was recommended to select the proper design strategy.

    The limitations of MEPDG were illustrated in that it did not account for the effects brought by the supplementary cementitious materials on the

    pavement design and it erroneously restrained the permissible range for concrete modulus of rupture input. Although a significant number of material

    inputs are possible with level 1 implementation of the MEPDG, these inputs are often used in a narrow context and are largely independent from other

    inputs and material properties. It cannot be presumed that the change in one input will lead to a full set of parametric changes that such a change

    would actually induce in practice.

  • Format:
  • Funding:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha-512:fd12afa1e72ffca0961cbe6e9b07e7bfa88505d8706672a68cd541c835366323b256be9b62975bd4d19a171e268592d1e7fd8d9cd282692eccc76edf860d51c4
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 779.85 KB ]
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.