Validating the Performance of Vehicle Classification Stations
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Validating the Performance of Vehicle Classification Stations

Filetype[PDF-4.74 MB]


English
Details You May Also Like

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
    Ohio State University
  • Corporate Contributors:
    Ohio. Dept. of Transportation. Office of Research and Development
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
    FHWA/OH-2012/7
  • Resource Type:
    Tech Report
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • TRIS Online Accession Number:
    01376420
  • Edition:
    Final Report
  • Corporate Publisher:
    Ohio. Dept. of Transportation
  • Abstract:
    Vehicle classification is used in many transportation applications, e.g., infrastructure management and planning. Typical of most developed countries, every state in the US maintains a network of vehicle classification stations to explicitly sort vehicles into several classes based on observable features, e.g., length, number of axles, axle spacing, etc. Periodic performance monitoring is necessary to ensure the quality of collected data; however, such testing has been prohibitively labor intensive to do as thoroughly as needed. To address these challenges, this study examined three interrelated facets of vehicle classification performance monitoring. First, we manually evaluate the performance of vehicle classification station on a per-vehicle basis, second we develop a portable LIDAR (light detection and ranging) based vehicle classification system that can be rapidly deployed, and third we use the LIDAR based system to automate the manual validation done in the first part using the tools from the second part. In the first part we examined over 18,000 vehicles, at several stations and found good performance overall, but performance for trucks was far worse than passenger vehicles. About a third of the errors were fixed by modifying the classification decision tree, the remaining two thirds of the errors are unavoidable because different classes have overlapping axle spacings or lengths (e.g., passenger vehicles and trucks, or commuter cars and motorcycles). All subsequent uses of the classification data must accommodate this unavoidable blurring. Next, we develop a side-fire LIDAR based classification system that does not require any calibration in the field. Finally, we develop a process to use the LIDAR system (or another temporary vehicle classification system) deployed concurrent to a permanent classification station to semi-automate the manual validation. The automated process does the bulk of the work, typically taking a user only a few minutes to validate all of the exceptions from all lanes over an hour of data. We found wide variance in performance from one station to the next. Since these errors are a function of the specific station, there would be benefit in the short term to leverage the LIDAR based system to evaluate the performance of many other classification stations to catch systematic errors that bias classification performance.
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Funding:
    State job no. 134516
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov