Development of salt tolerant grasses for roadside use.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Development of salt tolerant grasses for roadside use.

Filetype[PDF-2.95 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Corporate Creators:
    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Final; 2007-2010.
    • Abstract:
      Roadsides in Rhode Island and elsewhere are planted to mowed turfgrass in order to prevent erosion, improve aesthetics,

      maintain visibility, and provide a safe means of stopping errant vehicles. However, there are a number of ways in which

      mowed turfgrass is failing to meet the expectations of highway managers and the traveling public. Regular mowing and turf

      maintenance is expensive. Use of non-native plants has resulted in problems with invasive species. Most importantly, the

      seeded turfgrasses are not surviving in the roadside environment and so are failing to prevent erosion.

      Solving this problem requires answering two questions: why are the seeded turfgrasses dying? And how can this be fixed

      given severe limitations on funding? The purpose of this study was to seek answers to the first question, and then generate

      possible solutions to the second. The initial hypothesis was that high levels of deicing salt were responsible for the damage.

      We proposed to test this hypothesis by establishing test plots of 21 grass varieties selected for tolerance to salt in the highsalt

      zone at two locations: I-95 North in Hopkinton, and I-295 North in Lincoln. The grass variety trial was combined with a

      test of two potential low-cost soil amendments: yard waste compost and biosolids. We also proposed to monitor salt

      deposition over two winters at six sites to determine how much salt the grass was being exposed to, and how long the salt

      persisted in the root zone. Persistence is important because the grass is more sensitive to salt damage when it is actively

      growing (April-October) than during the winter months. At the same time we proposed to survey the vegetation on

      established, mowed roadsides to determine which plant species were surviving, as these might be good candidates for

      inclusion in a modified seed mix.

      We found that salt tolerant grasses showed no improvement in survival over the grass varieties already in use, even though

      the salt tolerant grasses had shown significantly better survival in greenhouse salt screening trials. This suggested that the

      salt was not the primary cause of vegetation failure; the finding that the salt did not persist in the root zone at levels high

      enough to cause plant damage past early April further supported this hypothesis. Soil amendment, however, had a dramatic

      effect on turfgrass survival. Perennial vegetation cover on plots amended with biosolids remained above 50% throughout the

      two-year study, and beyond.

      At the beginning of this study it was assumed that most of the vegetation surviving on mowed roadsides was the turfgrasses

      seeded by RIDOT or weeds such as quack grass, sheep sorrel, and crab grass. However, in surveys of seven sites in mowed

      areas along limited access highways in Rhode Island we found a total of 80 plant species, approximately half of which are

      native to Rhode Island.. Our results suggest that the seed mix used by RIDOT is not persisting on the roadside, but that it is

      gradually being replaced by native or naturalized species. Reductions in mowing would further this process, as they would

      permit more of these naturally-occurring plants to mature seed, filling in gaps created by vehicles and other disturbances.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.24