Quality and monitoring of structural rehabilitation measures : part 1 : description of potential defects.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Quality and monitoring of structural rehabilitation measures : part 1 : description of potential defects.

Filetype[PDF-805.65 KB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Alternative Title:
      Part 1 : description of potential defects.
    • Resource Type:
    • Abstract:
      For concrete rehabilitation, application of fiber reinforced polymer composites continues to grow in popularity. However, performance and expected lifetime of such rehabilitation measures are greatly depending on quality of workmanship and are jeopardized by a wide range of material defects. Prior to installation, potential defects must be known and evaluated upon their likeliness of occurrence during the individual project. Special attention should be paid to storage, handling and preparation of incoming materials as well as site preparation. Apart from a well-coordinated installation process, a suitable environment for work with composite materials must be provided. Although a successfully performed installation procedure with low defect occurrence would yield a fairly long service life, harsh environmental conditions can cause rapid deterioration of most composite strengthening systems. Hence, quality monitoring must be performed beyond the installation stage and continued throughout the lifetime of a rehabilitated structure. Tables 4-1 through 4-4 summarize all previously discussed defects by their initiating phase. Furthermore, possible potential effects are listed.

      While the types of defects to be encountered are mostly known, information on defect criticality and their effect on short/long-term structural performance remain widely unknown. Nevertheless, previous research has shown that defects like localized porosity, surface scratches or single broken fibers do not have a significant effect on material performance. Instead, they should be considered a material property that must be accounted for, especially if processing of composites is performed manually. Assessment of criticality of such “normal” defects will therefore be done on the basis of previous research results, whereas different techniques must be employed to characterize and quantify the effect of defects such as severe debonding, delamination, large voids, tow breakage or moisture accumulation, to name only a few. Thus, the need for further investigation in this field arises.

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26