Texas Triaxial - R Value correlation.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Texas Triaxial - R Value correlation.

Filetype[PDF-1.41 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Alternative Title:
      Texas Triaxial R Value correlation.
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      At the time of the instigation of this research the recommended AASHO design formula was based on a Soil Support Value which directly correlated with the "R-Value" system developed by F. N. Haveem, whereas, the flexible pavement design method currently used in Louisiana is based upon the Texas Triaxial Method. The AASHO further recommended that those states using a different design method correlate their past experience and data with the R-Value system. Although correlations, which seemed to be satisfactory, have been obtained for Group Index and CBR methods and a tentative correlation with the Texas Triaxial Strength Classes had been suggested, it appeared that the Texas Triaxial Strength Classes might require some further adjustment. It was with this objective in mind that this research project was undertaken; however, since the later version of the AASHO Recommended Guide for the Design of Flexible Pavement structures establishes the Soil Support Value in an abstract scale, it is felt that any correlation with Soil Support Value, except for an (S) value of 3.0, as such, is beyond the scope of this report. However, a new research project being prepared for the purpose of establishing the different factors used in AASHO design formula will attempt an accurate correlation for Support Values other than 3.0.
    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26