The objective evaluation of aircrew protective breathing equipment : V., mask/goggles combinations for female crewmembers.

Details

• Creators:
  deSteiguer, D. ; Saldivar, J.T. ; Higgins, E.A. ; Funkhouser, G.E.
• Corporate Creators:
  Civil Aeromedical Institute
• Corporate Contributors:
  United States. Office of Aviation Medicine
• Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Flight crews
  • Females
  • Oxygen equipment
  • Breathing apparatus
  • Anthropometry
  • Performance tests
  • Human subject testing
  • Flight crews--Anthropometry
  • Airplanes--Oxygen equipment--Testing
  • Breathing apparatus
• Publication/ Report Number:
  FAA-AM-83-14 ; DOT/FAA/AM-83/14
• Resource Type:
  Tech Report
• Geographical Coverage:
  United States
• Corporate Publisher:
  Civil Aerospace Medical Institute
• Abstract:
  A study was conducted to determine the degree of respiratory and visual protection given to the female crewmember by various crew oxygen mask/goggle combinations. The acceptance criteria for the mask/goggle combinations were for 10 of 12 test subjects to maintain a contaminant ratio of 0.05 or less in the oxygen mask and/or simultaneously 0.1 or less in the goggle while wearing eyeglasses. ; Of the 23 mask/goggle combinations tested with female subjects, 8 failed to meet the acceptance criteria for adequate protection. Comparison tests on anthropometric data from male and female subjects suggest that the failures may be due, in part, to size differences in cranial and facial dimensions.
• Format:
  PDF
• Download URL:
  https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/21245/dot_21245_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 343.01 KB]
• Collection(s):
  FAA Civil Aerospace Medical Institute ; US Transportation Collection
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha-512:9ce684d03c714f1e8a05c8d8595d0cef55437c228b32f222a3addfa183bb3f105f75387eb91813d5bfe9cebad7560ce9cc46c7b8c4089d99683ed95221e5c3c9