Evaluation of rubblization project in Ohio.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Evaluation of rubblization project in Ohio.

Filetype[PDF-4.20 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Corporate Contributors:
    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Final report.
    • Abstract:
      This study was initiated to systematically analyze the performance characteristics of ODOT’s completed rubblization and roll (R/R) projects and to develop guidelines regarding improved specifications.

      The study was conducted in three parts namely, (i) performance evaluation of Ohio’s R/R projects, (ii) overview of national perspective, and (iii) field demonstration of pavement breakers. The performance data obtained in terms of Pavement condition Rating (PCR) was processed to objectively analyze the effectiveness of rubblization on the functional condition of the constructed pavements. The Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) data was collected and analyzed to compare the structural conditions of the R/R pavements. Data was collected from other state DOTs to register the performance of their R/R pavements and to learn of their experience with R/R projects. Finally, a 1-day field demonstration of rubblization was conducted to demonstrate the capabilities of pavement breakers operating in Ohio to rubblize under identical conditions. This task was of particular value to verify the compliance of pavement breakers with ODOT specification 320.

      The study led to the following primary conclusions: R/R is an effective concrete and composite pavement rehabilitation technique. Results show an overall improvement in pavement performance; The performance period of surface layer of R/R pavements is estimated to be 11.7 years; The application of preventive maintenance treatment, depending on the type used in Ohio, extends the performance period of the constructed pavement; thereby implying consecutive application of PM treatments will result in R/R pavements achieving or exceeding a design life of 20 years; Rubblization contributes to significant changes in structural condition; the process transforms the rigid concrete layer into a flexible base; Lately, there are several variants of MHB. ODOT should change the equipment specification to allow other variants of MHBs; There is no adequate data available to relate fragment size to performance. However, based on the data from the demonstration study, it is inferred that ODOT should change the fragment specification to allow up to 12” fragments; ODOT’s quality control/quality assurance procedure requires digging a test pit at the beginning of the project to investigate the size and shape of fragments. This procedure is not consistently applied in all projects. ODOT would benefit by adopting a more stringent QC/QA procedure; It is important to revise ODOT’s policy regarding the criteria for the selection of candidate projects for rubblization and validate the threshold value established.

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26