Characterize dynamic dilemma zone and minimize its effect at signalized intersections.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Characterize dynamic dilemma zone and minimize its effect at signalized intersections.

Filetype[PDF-3.10 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Creators:
    • Corporate Contributors:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      Dilemma zone at signalized intersection has been recognized as a major potential causing rearend

      and right-angle crashes, and has been widely studied by researches since it was initially

      proposed as the GHM model in 1960. However, concepts conventionally defined to represent the

      yellow phase dilemma lack integrity. This research conducts a comprehensive literature review

      with attempt to clarify the interrelationship among dilemma zone, option zone, and indecision

      (decision) zone, and to develop a heuristic framework to present the contributing factors in

      dilemma zone modeling. A new method for modelling the locations and lengths of the dilemma

      zone using video-capture techniques and vehicle trajectory data is presented in this report. First,

      dilemma zone is mathematically modeled based on the GHM model. Then, field-observed

      trajectory data extracted by the video-capturing-based approach are used to calibrate the

      contributing factors involved in the dilemma zone model. The high accuracy of the time-based

      trajectory data has significantly enhanced the accuracy of the calibrated dilemma zone models.

      Two sets of trajectories are explored for calibrating the dilemma zone contributing factors. One

      is concerned with maximum yellow-onset safe passing distance and minimum yellow-onset

      stopping distance. The other is concerned with Xth percentile yellow-onset passing distance and

      (100-X)th percentile stopping distance for the prevailing travel behaviors. The latter alternative

      actually precludes “too conservative” and “too aggressive” maneuvers in response to yellow

      indications.

      One critically important result is the dilemma zone look-up charts that are developed

      based on the calibrated dilemma zone models. Such charts provide a convenient tool to identify

      the locations and lengths of dilemma zones for any speed and yellow duration conditions.

      Additionally, impact of arrival type and vehicle types are also explored. Results reveal that

      traffic in a good progression (Arrival Type ≥ 4) has a further option zone. It is also discovered

      that the length of option zone decreases as the vehicle size increases, while the downstream

      boundary of option zone is further from the stop line as the vehicle size increases. In overall, this

      project aims to conduct a preliminary research for providing a proof of concept about the

      modeling of dynamic dilemma zones, and validating the feasibility of the methodology for

      calibrating the dilemma zone model using trajectory data. The methodology used in this study

      establishes a solid basis for future research of the optimum signal detection placement and

      related dilemma zone protection problems with consideration of multi-speed protection.

      This project is granted by the Ohio Transportation Consortium (OTC). The research team

      is thankful to Dr. Ping Yi at University of Akron and staffs at OTC for their strong support to the

      project. Gratitude goes to Ph.D. students, Mr. Zhixia Li and Mr. Qingyi Ai, and M.S. students,

      Mr. Vijay Krishna Nemalapuri and Mr. Sudhir Reddy Itekyala for their effective assistances in

      field data collection. In particular, Mr. Zhixia Li took the lead in data collection and analysis and

      participated in drafting the report. Finally, the research team also expresses our thanks to Ms.

      Brenda Slaughter, senior Grant Administrator at UC Sponsored Research Services and Mr. Tom

      Davis, senior Grant Administrator at UC Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

      for their administrative support. This research could be not successfully finished without all their

      active participations, critical contributions, and strong supports.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26