Development of a rockfall hazard rating matrix for the State of Ohio.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Development of a rockfall hazard rating matrix for the State of Ohio.

Filetype[PDF-27.58 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
  • English

  • Details:

    • Corporate Contributors:
    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Final report.
    • Abstract:
      Although Ohio is not considered a "mountainous state", it is well documented that rockfalls are prevalent. Rockfalls pose a

      considerable risk to traffic safety, create maintenance problems, and exert a strain on limited maintenance funds available to the

      Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT). In order to assist ODOT in their prioritization for remediation work, a relative rockfall

      hazard rating matrix has been developed.

      108 sites along Ohio roadways were characterized for their geology, geometry and traffic characteristics. As compared to other

      states (Oregon, New York, and Washington) where rating systems have previously been developed, Ohio geology can be

      characterized as relatively flat lying alternating sequences of durable and nondurable sedimentary rocks. Because of this, the

      matrix focuses on differential weathering and undercutting present at road cuts.

      Data was collected for all sites and was statistically analyzed, using univariate, bivariate, and cluster analyses, to determine

      significant variables that characterize slopes. Statistical analyses indicated that slake durability index (SDI), slope angle, and

      slope height were the most significant variables in differentiating between sites

      .

      A matrix was then developed based on the statistical analysis and information gained from previously developed rating systems.

      Geologic parameters include geologic conditions (SDI and maximum amount of undercutting; discontinuity extent/orientation and

      joint roughness coefficient), potential block size, and hydrologic condition. Geometric parameters were evaluated through a

      comparison of actual field conditions to prescribed Ritchie catchment ditch design. Traffic parameters included average daily

      traffic, percent decision site distance, and pavement width. Information about rockfall history was unavailable for this research

      project, but its importance has been well documented (Pierson, 1991). For this reason, a subjective assessment of rockfall history

      has been included.

      The matrix assigns scores on an exponential scale based on relative risk, with higher scores representing more of a hazard. The

      developed matrix was applied to all sites, and scores ranged from 23 to 157. Based on the final scores, three broad-based

      categories of hazard were developed to more easily characterize the sites (high>100, moderate 50-100, and low<50). The rating

      matrix can be used to evaluate other rock slopes in Ohio and neighboring states with similar geology. These relative ratings can

      aid ODOT in making financial decisions and addressing legal issues of slope safety by examination of slopes using engineering

      principles.

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    Related Documents

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26