Assessment of Virginia's hybrid South Dakota road profiling system.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Assessment of Virginia's hybrid South Dakota road profiling system.

Filetype[PDF-2.40 MB]


  • English
    • Details You May Also Like

    Details:

    • Creators:
      McGhee, Kevin K
    • Corporate Creators:
    • Subject/TRT Terms:
    • Publication/ Report Number:
      FHWA/VA-96-R20
    • Resource Type:
      Tech Report
    • Geographical Coverage:
      Virginia
    • Edition:
      Final report.
    • Corporate Publisher:
      Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC)
    • Abstract:
      South Dakota Road Profiling (SDRP) systems have been widely sanctioned for use in assessing road roughness and rutting at highway speeds. Traditionally, these high-speed profiling systems have been built around ultrasonic height sensors. More recently, some designs have begun to substitute laser sensors to combat many of the limitations of sound-based equipment. The functional improvements possible with lasers are expensive, however. Whether the potential of lasers for high-speed profiling justifies the great increase in cost was a legitimate question. This report describes the steps that the Virginia Department of Transportation took to address that issue. In general, this research has found that both sensor types are capable of performing very well and with reasonable agreement. Repeatability tests indicated that the roughness indices calculated from laser based profiles are less subject to run-to-run variability than those developed from ultrasonic profiles. Tests to evaluate the effects of vehicle speed and sampling rate on the estimate of roughness have returned less conclusive results. Both tests suggested that the ultrasonic-based data was more highly correlated with the control data (i.e., that based on data collected with the Face Companies' Dipstick R) than the laser-based. The laser data, however, could be shown to be slightly more accurate, on average, than that based on the ultrasonic. Unfortunately, although the performance of the ultrasonic sensors on conventional surfaces has been adequate, their reliability has become a serious concern. In Virginia, humid surveying conditions are often unavoidable and the problem of wet ultrasonics has become more than a simple inconvenience. Hardware reliability may be the most compelling reason to migrate to pure laser roughness measurement. The adoption of only laser-based equipment in future purchases or leases is recommended.
    • Format:
      PDF
    • Collection(s):
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • Download URL:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26