The variability of the indirect tensile stripping test.

Maupin, G. W; Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC)

Advanced Search

Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

Advanced Search
Custom Query

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.

i

The variability of the indirect tensile stripping test.

1990-01-01
By Maupin, G. W

English

Details You May Also Like

Details:

Creators:

Maupin, G. W
Corporate Creators:

Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC)
Subject/TRT Terms:

[+]

Lime Pavements, Asphalt Concrete--Additives Pavements--Performance
Publication/ Report Number:

FHWA/VA-91/5 ; VTRC 91-R5

FHWA/VA-91/5 ; VTRC 91-R5 Less -
Resource Type:

Tech Report
Geographical Coverage:

Virginia
Edition:

Final report.June 1988July 1990.
Corporate Publisher:

Virginia Transportation Research Council (VTRC)
Abstract:

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the variability of the Virginia Department of Transportation's (VDOT) indirect tensile stripping test. Five contractor labs and eight VDOT labs participated in the study. Each lab performed three replicate tests on each of two mixes, one containing hydrated lime and one containing chemical antistripping additive. The standard deviation was 3.5 percent for within-lab results and 6.1 percent for between-lab results. Lack of significant correlations between strength and voids total mix indicated that a strength correction procedure for voids is not necessary. Examination of the VDOT specification indicates that contractors need to maintain the average TSR of the alternative mix containing chemical additive at least two standard deviations above the minimum value to ensure that single tests do not fail.
Format:

PDF
Collection(s):

US Transportation Collection
Main Document Checksum:

[+]

urn:sha256:677824b7a32f85e7c7630fe09279fc6d203ad2481ca2a9aadfd9fc13f097f157
Download URL:

https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/19265/dot_19265_DS1.pdf
File Type:

[PDF-1.69 MB]