Evaluation of concrete patching materials : final report.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Evaluation of concrete patching materials : final report.

Filetype[PDF-1.46 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      The project evaluated numerous repairs on portland cement concrete pavements and bridge decks made with a number of laboratory accepted, proprietary patching materials and portland cement concrete mixtures of different designs. It was ascertained that in the majority of cases when the patches failed, the failure resulted from the use of improper construction techniques, not from deficiencies in the patching materials used. Of the three proprietary materials determined not to have performed satisfactorily Embeco 411A, a magnesia phosphate material, has been used for 10 years. Fondu, a high alumina concrete material, and Duracal, a calcium sulfate material, performed so poorly that use of the former should be limited to small patches and use of the latter should not be allowed. In addition, it was ascertained that portland cement concrete incorporating carefully chosen admixtures can provide satisfactory service at a lower cost than proprietary patching materials. Upon reviewing the May 1984 final report the FHWA suggested several changes. Those changes have been incorporated into this revised version.
    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26