Effectiveness of six noise barriers on I-495 : final report.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Effectiveness of six noise barriers on I-495 : final report.

Filetype[PDF-2.92 MB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    While measurements made by the Virginia Highway and Transportation Research Council, other departments of transportation, and the Federal Highway Administration have generally shown that acoustical barriers perform as predicted, public acceptance has often been less than unanimous. Some complaints that barriers do not seem to reduce noise levels have been especially surprising. Thus, following a series of interviews of people residing adjacent to several barriers, an acoustical study of barriers was undertaken both to determine the effectiveness of the barriers and to find whether there was any correlation between the noise reductions perceived by the residents and those determined by analysis or measurement. At five of these barriers, pairs of measurements were made, one near a residence where a favorable comment had been made and one where an unfavorable comment had been made. At a sixth barrier, measurements were made only near a residence where an unfavorable comment had been made because of a paucity of good measurement sites near the residences where favorable comments had been made. This very small study, although not statistically meaningful, revealed some interesting trends. For example, many individuals may react to non-acoustical factors, such as problems of maintenance of the areas behind barriers and in other cases, individuals appear to react to their own perceptions of the physical parameters of the barrier rather than to its acoustical effectiveness. One particularly interesting conclusion was that the perception of the barriers' effectiveness tended to be negative when the ear level of a person standing at the door of his house was much closer to the same elevation as the top of the barrier than was the ear level of the person who responded positively.
  • Format:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov