Evaluation of crumb rubber in hot mix asphalt.
-
2004-07-01
Details:
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
OCLC Number:680651836
-
Edition:Final report; Sept. 2003-July 2004.
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
NTL Classification:NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Materials ; NTL-HIGHWAY/ROAD TRANSPORTATION-Construction and Maintenance ;
-
Abstract:An asphalt-rubber hot mix asphalt (AR-HMA) design was created using a Superpave 12.5mm gradation and a #30 (-) mesh
crumb rubber at 20% total weight of the asphalt binder. At this point in time, asphalt rubber has only been used with HMA
that contains a more open graded nature, such as open graded friction course (OGFC). However, OGFC is limited on it use
due to its potential problems (i.e. clogging and winter maintenance). However, a 12.5mm Superpave mix may be used on
almost any roadway in New Jersey and is most commonly found as the surface course. It is used for both new construction
and rehabilitation projects. Therefore, this mix type has the largest potential for usage, meaning that more tires can
eventually be recycled. However, two factors need to be considered prior to acceptance; performance and cost.
Four HMA mixes were constructed and tested in this study. Three baseline mixes using a PG64-22, PG70-22, and a PG76-
22 asphalt binder, as well as the AR-HMA mix which used crumb rubber blended with the same PG64-22 asphalt binder.
The influence of crumb rubber particle size on the compaction properties during the mixture design procedure was also
evaluated. This would provide a method of comparing the final mixture performance of different performance graded
binders to the AR-HMA mix. This type of methodology of testing the mixtures is extremely important due to the necessity
of ensuring the crumb rubber complying to the aggregate gradation volume limitations, and how the crumb rubber interacts
with this volume limitation under performance testing. Therefore, a number of different performance tests were conducted
on the four different HMA mixes: 1) Asphalt Pavement Analyzer, 2) Repeated Load Permanent Deformation testing using
the Simple Performance test specifications, 3) Dynamic Modulus, 4) Repeated Shear at Constant Height, 5) Frequency
Sweep at Constant Height,and 6) Simple Shear at Constant Height.
The results from the mixture design portion concluded that to provide consistent compactibility when using crumb rubber in
a 12.5mm Superpave design, the maximum particle size should not be greater than a #30 mesh. The performance tests
concluded that the AR-HMA mix performed as well as or better than the PG76-22 for every test conducted. For example,
the dynamic modulus test results showed that the AR-HMA had similar stiffnesses to the PG76-22 at the high test
temperatures, however, the AR-HMA had a much less stiffness at the low test temperature. This indicates that the ARHMA
mix design in this study will provide excellent rut resistance, while also providing excellent low temperature cracking
resistance. Essentially, by adding the crumb rubber to the PG64-22, the working temperature range of the asphalt binder
increased on both the high and low sides. Also, by performing similarily to the PG76-22, Bayshore Recycling now can
establish a cost comparison using the difference in cost between a HMA with a PG64-22 and a PG76-22.
-
Format:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
File Type:
Supporting Files
-
No Additional Files
More +