Evaluation of CDOT specifications for class H and HT crack resistant concrete.
-
2010-06-01
Details
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Edition:Final.
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:This study examined the performance of concrete mixtures designed to increase cracking resistance for Colorado bridge decks. The ; current CDOT Class H and HT concrete mixtures and nine other mixtures were investigated to aid in the development of a more crack ; resistant concrete specification. A total of eleven concrete mixtures were designed, batched, and tested for their fresh and hardened ; concrete performance. Specifically, the designs differed by type of cement, w/cm, cement content, supplementary cementitious materials ; (SCMs), use of chemical admixtures, and aggregate type. Compressive strength, permeability, freeze-thaw resistance, and restrained ; shrinkage cracking were evaluated and documented in this report. Lower w/cm resulted in high early compressive strengths and rates of ; strength and strain development. Increasing the w/cm to 0.44 and Class F fly ash replacement levels up to 30% was beneficial in ; controlling strength gain. A low cement content mixture with increased w/cm and fly ash replacement proved to be beneficial. When ; SCMs were not utilized, a low cement content of 6.0 bags was beneficial. When SCMs were used, increased cement content helped to ; maintain the same properties. Type G, coarse-ground cement was beneficial to strain and strength at the higher w/cm of 0.42 and low ; cementitious materials content. At a lower w/cm of 0.38, the mixture behaved similarly to the control mixture fabricated using Type II ; cement, developing strain and strength at an average rate. ; A high dosage rate of a shrinkage reducing admixture was extremely beneficial in controlling both the development rate and ultimate ; strain of the mixture, while maintaining adequate development of ultimate strength at all ages. An average dosage rate of a set retarder ; only retarded the initial strength development slightly. After 1 day of age, the development of strength and strain was substantially ; increased. Although the concrete containing the set retarder reached higher compressive strengths more quickly than anticipated, the ; concrete did not crack in the AASHTO PP34 test and was moderately durable.
-
Format:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:urn:sha-512:00854340d65c4d78d8017205177351fcb80cfc89bcdfb510dab9db951150eefff19ce05700486bab5b32684af83d3b946a84c450236c74421e133f69ec37ed8c