Evaluation of CDOT specifications for class H and HT crack resistant concrete.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Evaluation of CDOT specifications for class H and HT crack resistant concrete.

Filetype[PDF-3.06 MB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Final.
    • Abstract:
      This study examined the performance of concrete mixtures designed to increase cracking resistance for Colorado bridge decks. The

      current CDOT Class H and HT concrete mixtures and nine other mixtures were investigated to aid in the development of a more crack

      resistant concrete specification. A total of eleven concrete mixtures were designed, batched, and tested for their fresh and hardened

      concrete performance. Specifically, the designs differed by type of cement, w/cm, cement content, supplementary cementitious materials

      (SCMs), use of chemical admixtures, and aggregate type. Compressive strength, permeability, freeze-thaw resistance, and restrained

      shrinkage cracking were evaluated and documented in this report. Lower w/cm resulted in high early compressive strengths and rates of

      strength and strain development. Increasing the w/cm to 0.44 and Class F fly ash replacement levels up to 30% was beneficial in

      controlling strength gain. A low cement content mixture with increased w/cm and fly ash replacement proved to be beneficial. When

      SCMs were not utilized, a low cement content of 6.0 bags was beneficial. When SCMs were used, increased cement content helped to

      maintain the same properties. Type G, coarse-ground cement was beneficial to strain and strength at the higher w/cm of 0.42 and low

      cementitious materials content. At a lower w/cm of 0.38, the mixture behaved similarly to the control mixture fabricated using Type II

      cement, developing strain and strength at an average rate.

      A high dosage rate of a shrinkage reducing admixture was extremely beneficial in controlling both the development rate and ultimate

      strain of the mixture, while maintaining adequate development of ultimate strength at all ages. An average dosage rate of a set retarder

      only retarded the initial strength development slightly. After 1 day of age, the development of strength and strain was substantially

      increased. Although the concrete containing the set retarder reached higher compressive strengths more quickly than anticipated, the

      concrete did not crack in the AASHTO PP34 test and was moderately durable.

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26