Evaluation of CDOT specifications for class H and HT crack resistant concrete.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Evaluation of CDOT specifications for class H and HT crack resistant concrete.

Filetype[PDF-3.06 MB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Edition:
    Final.
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    This study examined the performance of concrete mixtures designed to increase cracking resistance for Colorado bridge decks. The

    current CDOT Class H and HT concrete mixtures and nine other mixtures were investigated to aid in the development of a more crack

    resistant concrete specification. A total of eleven concrete mixtures were designed, batched, and tested for their fresh and hardened

    concrete performance. Specifically, the designs differed by type of cement, w/cm, cement content, supplementary cementitious materials

    (SCMs), use of chemical admixtures, and aggregate type. Compressive strength, permeability, freeze-thaw resistance, and restrained

    shrinkage cracking were evaluated and documented in this report. Lower w/cm resulted in high early compressive strengths and rates of

    strength and strain development. Increasing the w/cm to 0.44 and Class F fly ash replacement levels up to 30% was beneficial in

    controlling strength gain. A low cement content mixture with increased w/cm and fly ash replacement proved to be beneficial. When

    SCMs were not utilized, a low cement content of 6.0 bags was beneficial. When SCMs were used, increased cement content helped to

    maintain the same properties. Type G, coarse-ground cement was beneficial to strain and strength at the higher w/cm of 0.42 and low

    cementitious materials content. At a lower w/cm of 0.38, the mixture behaved similarly to the control mixture fabricated using Type II

    cement, developing strain and strength at an average rate.

    A high dosage rate of a shrinkage reducing admixture was extremely beneficial in controlling both the development rate and ultimate

    strain of the mixture, while maintaining adequate development of ultimate strength at all ages. An average dosage rate of a set retarder

    only retarded the initial strength development slightly. After 1 day of age, the development of strength and strain was substantially

    increased. Although the concrete containing the set retarder reached higher compressive strengths more quickly than anticipated, the

    concrete did not crack in the AASHTO PP34 test and was moderately durable.

  • Format:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov