Use of reinforced soil foundation (RSF) to support shallow foundation : summary report, November 2008.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Use of reinforced soil foundation (RSF) to support shallow foundation : summary report, November 2008.

Filetype[PDF-1013.07 KB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Summary report; Nov. 2008.
    • Abstract:
      This research study investigates the potential benefits of using reinforced soil foundations to improve the bearing

      capacity and reduce the settlement of shallow foundations on soils. To implement this objective, a total of 117

      tests, including 38 laboratory model tests on silty clay embankment soil, 51 laboratory model tests on sand, 22

      laboratory model tests on Kentucky crushed limestone, and 6 large-scale field tests on silty clay embankment soil

      were performed at the Louisiana Transportation Research Center to study the behavior of reinforced soil

      foundations. The influences of the different variables and parameters contributing to the improved performance of

      reinforced soil foundation were examined in these tests. In addition, an instrumentation program with pressure

      cells and strain gauges was designed to investigate the stress distribution in soil mass with and without

      reinforcement and the strain distribution along the reinforcement. The test results showed that the inclusion of

      reinforcement can significantly improve the soil’s bearing capacity and reduce the footing settlement. The

      geogrids with higher tensile modulus performed better than geogrids with lower tensile modulus. The strain

      developed along the reinforcement is directly related to the settlement, and, therefore, higher tension would be

      developed for geogrid with higher modulus under the same footing settlement. The test results also showed that

      the inclusion of reinforcement will redistribute the applied load to a wider area, thus minimizing stress

      concentration and achieving a more uniform stress distribution. The redistribution of stresses below the reinforced

      zone will result in reducing the consolidation settlement of the underlying weak, clayey, soil which is directly

      related to the induced stress. Insignificant strain measured in the geogrid beyond its effective length of 4.0 ~ 6.0B

      indicated that the geogrid beyond this length provides a negligible extra reinforcement effect.

    • Format:
    • Funding:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26