The use of recycled concrete aggregate in a dense graded aggregate base course.
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

The use of recycled concrete aggregate in a dense graded aggregate base course.

Filetype[PDF-791.08 KB]


  • English

  • Details:

    • Publication/ Report Number:
    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Edition:
      Final report; 1/2007-3/2008.
    • Abstract:
      The research project was broken up into 2 different parts. The first part involved evaluating the potential use of the Time

      Domain Reflectometry, TDR (ASTM D6780), as a non-nuclear means for determining the dry density and moisture content of

      granular base and subbase aggregates during quality control. Just prior to the study, Humboldt Equipment Company provided

      a device called the Electrical Density Gauge (EDG) that also claimed to be a non-nuclear means of determining dry density and

      moisture content. Both units were used on five separate field trials (5 sections for the TDR and 3 sections for the EDG) and

      compared against the NJDOT’s nuclear density gauge. The field trials indicated that the TDR test method, as it currently

      stands according to ASTM D6780, does not compare well with the nuclear density gauge readings. This was mainly attributed

      to the TDR’s soil constant calibration procedure. There also appeared to be a lack of sensitivity with the TDR method when

      compared to the nuclear gauge. The EDG showed a better correlation to the nuclear gauge, although this was expected since

      at the time of the study, the EDG device required field calibration. A newer version of the EDG now incorporates a laboratory

      calibration procedure that would eliminate the need for field calibration with a nuclear gauge.

      The second part of the research study was to evaluate potential methods of increasing the permeability of recycled concrete

      aggregate (RCA), while attempting to maintain its structural integrity (i.e. – California Bearing Ratio, CBR). Before laboratory

      testing began, a survey was developed, sent to various state agencies, and tabulated to determine if other state agencies

      currently utilized RCA, and if so, what experience did they have regarding the drainage characteristics of the material. After the

      survey results were tabulated, laboratory testing was conducted on RCA blended with different aggregates; dense-graded

      aggregate (DGA), NJDOT I-3, and poorly graded sand. Work was also conducted on RCA material which was processed over

      a coarser sieve size (2 inches), as opposed to the finer 1.5 inches currently specified by NJDOT, in an attempt to include a

      larger, coarser fraction that could open up the internal structure of the RCA. This was in an attempt to meet some of the state

      agency specifications of the various states who responded to the survey saying they did not have any current issues with the

      permeability/drainage of their RCA materials. The results of the laboratory testing showed that the best performing

      modification to the RCA was when blended with 50% DGA. This increased the permeability to levels considered average,

      while still providing excellent bearing strength. The attempts of using the NJDOT I-3 and poorly graded sand did not

      dramatically increase the permeability, while a decrease in bearing strength was still reported. Increasing the top size of the

      processed/screened RCA from 1.5 inches to 2.0 inches helped to increase the permeability, while achieving the same bearing

      strength properties (CBR).

    • Format:
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov

    Version 3.26