Cost-effectiveness and performance of overlay systems in Illinois, volume 2 : guidelines for interlayer system selection decision when used in HMA overlays.
-
2009-05-01
Details:
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Edition:Project report, 2005-2008
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:In an effort to control reflective cracking in hot-mix asphalt (HMA) overlays placed over Portland Cement
Concrete (PCC) pavements, several reflective crack control (RCC) systems, including interlayer systems,
have been used. However, the cost-effectiveness of interlayer systems is still in doubt due their performance
and additional costs. In this project, a decision making procedure to aid in the selection of cost-effective
interlayer systems was developed. As a core step in evaluating the benefit-cost ratio (B/C) of interlayer
systems, a user-friendly life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) program, CIND (Cost-effective INterlayer system
Decision program) was developed. Based on sensitivity analysis, a B/C prediction model was proposed, which
takes into account a performance benefit ratio (PBR) parameter, a material cost ratio (MCR), and a
construction time ratio (CTR). Using the B/C model, a table was developed which allows the user to
determine the most cost-effective interlayer system in a rehabilitation project for a given equivalent single-axle
load (ESAL) level, representative low temperature (TL), and existing concrete pavement joint spacing (JS).
Finally, a decision making tree was constructed to simplify the process of determining the most cost-effective
and compatible interlayer system for a given project. Depending on project significance and/or information
availability, pavement engineers can select from one of three newly developed B/C evaluation tools (in order
of sophistication): application tables, B/C prediction model, and the CIND computer program. Using these
tools, it was found that B/C increases as PBR increases or MCR and CTR decrease. In general, System D is
cost-effective in a wide range of ESALs and TL values; especially in a cold region with lower traffic volume.
The application range is reduced with the increase of JS, however. System E is relatively cost-effective only in
warm regions having higher traffic volume.
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type: