Tack coat optimization for HMA overlays : accelerated pavement test report.

Details

• Creators:
  Al-Qadi, Imad L. ; Carpenter, Samuel H. ; Leng, Zhen ; Ozer, Hasan ; S. Trepanier, James
• Corporate Contributors:
  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering ; Illinois. Department of Transportation. Bureau of Materials and Physical Research
• Subject/TRT Terms:
  Hot Mix Asphalt Pavements Overlays (Pavements) Pavement Components Pavement Cracking Pavement Design Pavement Layers
• Publication/ Report Number:
  FHWA-ICT-09-035;ICT-09-035, UILU-ENG-2009-2006
• Resource Type:
  Tech Report
• Geographical Coverage:
  Illinois
• Edition:
  Final report
• Corporate Publisher:
  Illinois Center for Transportation
• Abstract:
  Interface bonding between hot-mix asphalt (HMA) overlays and Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements is one
  
  of the most significant factors affecting overlay service life. This study was performed to quantify the effects of HMA type,
  
  tack coat type, tack coat application rate, and PCC surface texture on the interface bonding and overlay performance
  
  through laboratory testing, accelerated pavement testing (APT), and numerical modeling. This report presents the
  
  outcomes of the APT, as well as the numerical modeling of pavement interfaces. The results of the laboratory testing are
  
  covered in a companion report.
  
  The APT built on and validated previously completed laboratory tests where an HMA overlay was placed on top of
  
  an existing PCC pavement having various surface textures including smooth, transverse tined, longitudinal tined, and
  
  milled. In addition, zebra sections were included to evaluate the effect of non-uniform tack coat application. Asphalt
  
  emulsion SS-1hP and cutback asphalt RC-70 were applied at three residual application rates, 0.02, 0.04, and 0.09 gal/yd2
  
  (0.09, 0.18, and 0.41 L/m2); asphalt binder PG64-22 was applied at 0.04 gal/yd2 (0.41 L/m2). Two HMA designs, standard
  
  binder mix and moisture sensitive binder mix, were used along with the three tack coats. Twenty-five pavement test
  
  sections were constructed and loaded with the Accelerated Transportation Loading ASsembly (ATLAS) at the centerline.
  
  The tensile strains at the bottom of HMA, to quantify potential interface slippage, were measured for selective sections, and
  
  primary HMA rutting was analyzed for all sections. The APT results validated laboratory determined optimum tack coat
  
  application rate, which provided the lowest interface strain and surface rutting in the field. Both PG64-22 and SS-1hP
  
  showed better rutting resistance than RC-70. Milled PCC surface provided lower rutting than transverse-tined and smooth
  
  surfaces. The field testing also showed that PCC cleaning methods play an important role in the HMA-PCC bonding. Higher
  
  rutting depth was measured in sections with uneven tack coat distribution compared to that with uniform tack coat
  
  distribution. Field testing results don’t show enough evidence to prove that using a moisture-sensitive mix will result in
  
  higher HMA surface rutting.
  
  
• Format:
  PDF
• Collection(s):
  US Transportation Collection
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha-512:daff294d50e096a0fa6dceb3dd5fb57867d85c19b3d2081a2ada676ebb3c2c8eeff284ef420f5888e68382da6c677ed3c9941c3a22378e6b149f8165dc1b1a29
• Download URL:
  https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/16711/dot_16711_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 3.66 MB ]