U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Field performance of epoxy-coated reinforcing steel in Virginia bridge decks.

File Language:
English


Details

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    In this study, the corrosion protection performance of epoxy-coated reinforcing steel ; (ECR) was evaluated using approximately 250 concrete cores from 18 bridge decks in Virginia. ; The decks were 2 to 20 years old at the time of the investigation. The deck field inspections ; included a crack survey and cover depth determination in the right traffic lane. A maximum of ; 12 cores with the top reinforcement randomly located in the lowest 12th percentile cover depth ; were taken from each bridge deck. Because of the safety concerns associated with taking cores ; from the lower steel mat, and to minimize damage to the bridge, a maximum of only 3 cores ; were taken through the truss bars. The laboratory evaluation of the concrete cores included a ; visual examination and a determination of the carbonation depth, moisture content, absorption, ; percent saturation, and chloride content at a 13-mm depth. The rapid chloride permeability test ; was also performed for the surface and base concrete on samples obtained from the cores taken ; through the truss bars to determine chloride permeability. The ECR inspection consisted of a ; visual examination, a damage evaluation, and a determination of coating thickness and adhesion. ; The condition of the steel underneath the epoxy coating was also evaluated. ; Adhesion loss of the epoxy coating to the steel surface was detected in all but one deck ; that was 4 years old and older. The epoxy coatings were debonding from the reinforcing bars. ; Whereas a bonded coating can be expected to protect the steel, a debonded coating allows ; chlorides, moisture, and oxygen to reach the steel and initiate a rapid corrosion mechanism. ; Reinforcing bars in various stages of adhesion loss showed visible signs of a corrosion process ; underneath the coating, suggesting that ECR will provide little or no additional service life for ; concrete bridge decks in comparison to bare steel. Other systems that will provide longer ; protection against chloride-induced corrosion of the reinforcing steel with a higher degree of ; reliability should be considered.
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 1.84 MB]
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha256:7ec2fb950111b26d2f0e92e6bf0cdff96cd8355e7ce65456a5c0773b16fd11b1
File Language:
English
ON THIS PAGE
 Found an issue?
Send us an email at:
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.