FAA, Fire Safety. This collection contains reports and resources from the Federal Aviation Administration’s Fire Safety Branch research program. Bookmark this collection: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/collection_fire_safety.
This contract study defined two conceptual approaches for an advanced smoke/fire detection system for commercial passenger jet aircraft that would provide for accurate, timely guidance to the flight crew for their use in responding to possible and/or actual inflight smoke and fire events within the pressurized fuselage. The motivation for this work
...
Reynolds, T. L., Grimstad, G. E., & Anderson, C. (1991). Aircraft Command in Emergency Situations (ACES) Phase 1: Concept Development (Report No. DOT/FANCT-90/21). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93199
Reynolds, Thomas L., Gregory E. Grimstad, and Charles Anderson. Aircraft Command in Emergency Situations (ACES) Phase 1: Concept Development. Report no. DOT/FANCT-90/21. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1991. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93199.
Reynolds, Thomas L., et al. Aircraft Command in Emergency Situations (ACES) Phase 1: Concept Development. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1991, Report no. DOT/FANCT-90/21, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93199.
The purpose of this project was to determine the likelihood of fire development and growth in accessible areas of an aircraft and the resulting hazards to cabin occupants from these fires. Numerous inflight fires or smoke events occur in accessible areas but are controlled by the crew or self- extinguish. Fatal inflight fires are rare events but or
...
Blake, D. (1991). Development and Growth of Inaccessible Aircraft Fires under Inflight Airflow Conditions (Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-91/2). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93220
Blake, David. Development and Growth of Inaccessible Aircraft Fires under Inflight Airflow Conditions. Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-91/2. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1991. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93220.
Blake, David Development and Growth of Inaccessible Aircraft Fires under Inflight Airflow Conditions. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1991, Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-91/2, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93220.
A test study was conducted using Halon 1211 and Halon 1301 fire extinguishing agents and aerosol smoke to study their behavior in a pressurized Cessna C-421B aircraft. Halon fire extinguishers were discharged and monitored at various locations to determine the concentrations of neat halon gases present, their dissipation rates and any resultant tox
...
Slusher, G. R., Abramowitz, A., & Neese, W. E. (1990). Smoke and Extinguisher Agent Dissipation in a Small Pressurized Fuselage (Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-89/31). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93095
Slusher, G. R., A. Abramowitz, and W. E. Neese. Smoke and Extinguisher Agent Dissipation in a Small Pressurized Fuselage. Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-89/31. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1990. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93095.
Slusher, G. R., et al. Smoke and Extinguisher Agent Dissipation in a Small Pressurized Fuselage. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1990, Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-89/31, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93095.
A buoyant artificial smoke generator was developed for airplane test applications. In the device, theatrical smoke is mixed with a mixture of helium and air. The total gas flow, the helium to air ratio, and the theatrical smoke, particulate generation rate can all be varied in the device. A gas mixture of 50 percent each of helium and air has the b
...
Eklund, T. I. (1990). Generation of Buoyant Plume of Artificial Smoke for Airplane Tests (Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-90/9). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93173
Eklund, Thor I.. Generation of Buoyant Plume of Artificial Smoke for Airplane Tests. Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-90/9. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1990. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93173.
Eklund, Thor I. Generation of Buoyant Plume of Artificial Smoke for Airplane Tests. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1990, Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-90/9, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93173.
In order to assure prescribed levels of fire safety in civil aircraft, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requires that a variety of fire test methods be used to demonstrate that aircraft materials meet specified performance criteria when exposed to heat or flame. In principle, the specific test method required serves as a surrogate for the
...
Boeing Commercial Airplane (1990). Aircraft Material Fire Test Handbook (Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-89/15). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93061
Boeing Commercial Airplane. Aircraft Material Fire Test Handbook. Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-89/15. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1990. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93061.
Boeing Commercial Airplane Aircraft Material Fire Test Handbook. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1990, Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-89/15, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93061.
A means of calibrating total heat flux gauges using a comparative (substitution) technique has been established. An apparatus consisting of a reference radiometer, a stable infrared radiant heater capable of producing flux levels up to 3.7 W/cm2, and a precision alignment mechanism has been constructed. The reference radiometer was characterized by
...
Steckler, K., Tu, K., & Twilley, W. (1990). Calibration Technique for Heat Flux Sensors Used in Fire Experiments and Standard Fire Tests (Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-89/26). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93088
Steckler, K., K. Tu, and W. Twilley. Calibration Technique for Heat Flux Sensors Used in Fire Experiments and Standard Fire Tests. Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-89/26. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1990. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93088.
Steckler, K., et al. Calibration Technique for Heat Flux Sensors Used in Fire Experiments and Standard Fire Tests. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1990, Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-89/26, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93088.
The purpose of this project was to determine the hazards associated with aerosol cans involved in cargo fires. Over the last several years the chlorofluorocarbon propellant used in aerosol cans has been replaced with hydrocarbons such as butane, propane, and isobutane. These flammable gases would normally be prohibited on passenger carrying airplan
...
Blake, D. (1989). Fire Hazards of Aerosol Cans in Aircraft Cargo Compartments (Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-89/32). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93096
Blake, David. Fire Hazards of Aerosol Cans in Aircraft Cargo Compartments. Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-89/32. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1989. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93096.
Blake, David Fire Hazards of Aerosol Cans in Aircraft Cargo Compartments. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1989, Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-89/32, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93096.
Although three different laboratory-scale tests WE:H: evaluated in this wire program, only the sixty-degree test is currently required by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). All test specimens with the exception of MIL-W-5086/1-PVC nylon passed this test with average burn lengths within the 3-inch maximum and no flame time. The MIL-W-5086/1
...
Cahill, P. (1989). Flammability, Smoke and Dry Arc Tracking Tests of Aircraft Electrical Wire Insulations (Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-89/21). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93073
Cahill, Patricia. Flammability, Smoke and Dry Arc Tracking Tests of Aircraft Electrical Wire Insulations. Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-89/21. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1989. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93073.
Cahill, Patricia Flammability, Smoke and Dry Arc Tracking Tests of Aircraft Electrical Wire Insulations. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1989, Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-89/21, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93073.
This document contains supplemental data to support DOT/FAA/CT-89/9. It consists of the following appendixes to that report:Appendix A, Test 90-1Appendix B, Test 90-2Appendix C, Test 90-3Appendix D, Smoke Meter DataAppendix E, Acceptance Test Data Sheets, Flow Control Valves
Maylor, E. L. (1989). Airplane Tests of Enhanced Emergency Smoke Venting (Supplemental Data) (Report No. DOT/FA A/CT -89/9-A). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93055
Maylor, Elliott L.. Airplane Tests of Enhanced Emergency Smoke Venting (Supplemental Data). Report no. DOT/FA A/CT -89/9-A. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1989. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93055.
Maylor, Elliott L. Airplane Tests of Enhanced Emergency Smoke Venting (Supplemental Data). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1989, Report no. DOT/FA A/CT -89/9-A, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93055.
This airplane test program evaluated the capability of air conditioning (environmental control) system modifications to enhance the venting of neutral or buoyant smoke that may be continuously injected into the passenger cabin during an inflight fire emergency. The program used a Boeing 757 airplane modified by adding an outflow valve in the forwar
...
Maylor, E. L. (1989). Airplane Tests of Enhanced Emergency Smoke Venting (Report No. DOT/FANCT-89/9). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93054
Maylor, Elliott L.. Airplane Tests of Enhanced Emergency Smoke Venting. Report no. DOT/FANCT-89/9. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1989. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93054.
Maylor, Elliott L. Airplane Tests of Enhanced Emergency Smoke Venting. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1989, Report no. DOT/FANCT-89/9, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/93054.
This technology assessment determined the feasibility of FAA support for development of a computer-based system to supplement crew function during in-flight fire/smoke incidents. The system was designated Aircraft Command in Emergency Situations (ACES). It was limited to fire/smoke incidents in areas other than power-plant or lifting and control su
...
Blomberg, R. D., Bishop, E. W., Hamilton, J. W., & Custer, R. L. P. (1988). Technology Assessment for Aircraft Command in Emergency Situations (Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-88/20). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92971
Blomberg, Richard D., Edward W. Bishop, John W. Hamilton, and Richard L. P. Custer. Technology Assessment for Aircraft Command in Emergency Situations. Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-88/20. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1988. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92971.
Blomberg, Richard D., et al. Technology Assessment for Aircraft Command in Emergency Situations. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1988, Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-88/20, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92971.
Electrical wet-wire arc tracking is a phenomenon that has been known for many years. This can occur when leakage currents on a wet insulation surface are great enough to vaporize the moisture, resulting in the formation of dry spots. These dry spots offer a high amount of resistance! to current flow. In turn, an induced voltage will develop across
...
Cahill, P., & Dailey, J. H. (1988). Aircraft Electrical Wet-Wire Arc Tracking (Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-88/4). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92948
Cahill, Patricia and James H. Dailey. Aircraft Electrical Wet-Wire Arc Tracking. Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-88/4. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1988. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92948.
Cahill, Patricia, and James H. Dailey Aircraft Electrical Wet-Wire Arc Tracking. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1988, Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-88/4, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92948.
This study evaluated two concepts for modifying the air conditioning systems of large commercial airplanes to enhance the venting of smoke that may be continuously injected into the passenger cabin during inflight fire emergencies. Data from past fire accidents and airplane tests provided a basis for creating four fire/smoke scenarios and deriving
...
Maylor, E. L. (1988). Enhanced Emergency Smoke Venting (Report No. DOT/FANCI'-88/22). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92972
Maylor, Elliott L.. Enhanced Emergency Smoke Venting. Report no. DOT/FANCI'-88/22. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1988. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92972.
Maylor, Elliott L. Enhanced Emergency Smoke Venting. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1988, Report no. DOT/FANCI'-88/22, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92972.
This study describes Fire Safety systems, cabin design and materials in cabin areas of ten common commuter aircraft. The aircraft were selected based upon a balance of current population and aircraft most commonly delivered. These aircraft represent 880 of 1100 commuter aircraft and probably will be the majority of the commuter fleet in the future.
Clarke, R., Kane, D., & Stewart, C. (1988). Current Fire Safety Design Aspects of Commuter Aircraft (Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-87/32). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92918
Clarke, Richard, Deborah Kane, and Carla Stewart. Current Fire Safety Design Aspects of Commuter Aircraft. Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-87/32. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1988. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92918.
Clarke, Richard, et al. Current Fire Safety Design Aspects of Commuter Aircraft. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1988, Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-87/32, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92918.
A computer model was developed and utilized for calculating the benefits of passenger protective breathing devices and other fire safety improvements based on an analysis of accidents involving fire occurring from 1966 to 1986. The results of exercising this model on 20 past accidents indicate that the lives saved is very sensitive to assumption. I
...
Speitel, L. C., & Hill, R. G. (1988). Study of Benefits of Passenger Protective Breathing Equipment From Analysis of Past Accidents (Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-88/03). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92944
Speitel, L. C. and R. G. Hill. Study of Benefits of Passenger Protective Breathing Equipment From Analysis of Past Accidents. Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-88/03. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1988. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92944.
Speitel, L. C., and R. G. Hill Study of Benefits of Passenger Protective Breathing Equipment From Analysis of Past Accidents. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1988, Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-88/03, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92944.
This report describes a four phase study to identify potential fuel containment concepts for transport category aircraft. A literature survey was performed and the relative contributions from 53 documents are noted. Transport airplane data are summarized including the results from full-scale airplane crash tests and section tests. Analyses results
...
Wittlin, G. (1987). Fuel Containment Concepts - Transport Category Airplanes (Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-87/18). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92901
Wittlin, G.. Fuel Containment Concepts - Transport Category Airplanes. Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-87/18. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1987. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92901.
Wittlin, G. Fuel Containment Concepts - Transport Category Airplanes. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1987, Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-87/18, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92901.
Experiments have shown that FM-9 antimisting fuel had the potential for precluding the fine mist and associated fireball generation in aircraft post-crash situations while allowing for the restoration of the filtration and atomizing characteristics required for aircraft operation. The Federal Aviation Administration, the Aircraft Establishment, the
...
Wilson, J. J. (1987). Laboratory Characterization Tests for Antimisting Fuel (Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-86/23). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92735
Wilson, Joseph J.. Laboratory Characterization Tests for Antimisting Fuel. Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-86/23. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1987. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92735.
Wilson, Joseph J. Laboratory Characterization Tests for Antimisting Fuel. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1987, Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-86/23, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92735.
This report summarizes results from a 20-month technical effort involving the design, fabrication and evaluation of an Antimisting Kerosene (AMK) degrader. The principal objective was to demonstrate the feasibility of employing a high-speed centrifugal pump to condition AMK fuel for use in an aircraft turbine engine. The effects of AMK fuel on the
...
Coffinberry, G. A., & Tucker, T. M. (1987). Antimisting Fuel (AMK) Flight Degrader Development and Aircraft Fuel System Investigation (Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-86/6). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92733
Coffinberry, George A. and Thomas M. Tucker. Antimisting Fuel (AMK) Flight Degrader Development and Aircraft Fuel System Investigation. Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-86/6. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1987. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92733.
Coffinberry, George A., and Thomas M. Tucker Antimisting Fuel (AMK) Flight Degrader Development and Aircraft Fuel System Investigation. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1987, Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-86/6, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92733.
This report describes a study of fires and interior materials in General Aviation (GA) aircraft during 1974-1983. The purpose of the study was to learn trends in GA fires and the materials used in aircraft interiors. The study covered aircraft of less than 12,501 pounds gross weight, not in commercial or agricultural operations. Fires are a minor p
...
Benner, L. J., Clarke, R., & Lawton, R. (1987). Study of General Aviation Fire Accidents (1974-1983) (Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-86/24). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92698
Benner, Ludwig, Jr., Richard Clarke, and Russell Lawton. Study of General Aviation Fire Accidents (1974-1983). Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-86/24. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1987. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92698.
Benner, Ludwig, Jr., et al. Study of General Aviation Fire Accidents (1974-1983). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1987, Report no. DOT/FAA/CT-86/24, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92698.
Hand-held Halon 1211 and Halon 1301 fire extinguishers of 2.5-pound and 3-pound capacity, respectively, were discharged to determine their effectiveness on instrument panel fires in a small aircraft. The fires consisted of aircraft wire insulation and hydraulic fluid located below and behind the instrument panel in a Piper Model PA-30 Twin Comanche
...
Slusher, G. R., Wright, J. A., & Speitel, L. C. (1986). Halon Extinguishment of Small Aircraft Instrument Panel Fires (Report No. DOT /FAA/CT-86/26). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92655
Slusher, G. R., J. A. Wright, and L. C. Speitel. Halon Extinguishment of Small Aircraft Instrument Panel Fires. Report no. DOT /FAA/CT-86/26. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1986. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92655.
Slusher, G. R., et al. Halon Extinguishment of Small Aircraft Instrument Panel Fires. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. William J. Hughes Technical Center, 1986, Report no. DOT /FAA/CT-86/26, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/92655.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.