This report presents the results of 50 anti-icing endurance (AET) tests performed at the Anti-Icing Materials International Laboratory (AMIL) with unsheared samples of two certified Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Type I aircraft deicing fluids: OCTAFLO of Octagon Process Inc. (propylene glycol-based) and ADF Concrete of Union Carbide (ethyle
...
Bouchard, K., LaForte, J. L., & Beisswenger, A. (2001). Anti-Icing Endurance Time Tests of Two Certified SAE Type I Aircraft Deicing Fluids (Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-01/13). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/61475
Bouchard, Kathy, Jean-Louis LaForte, and Arlene Beisswenger. Anti-Icing Endurance Time Tests of Two Certified SAE Type I Aircraft Deicing Fluids. Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-01/13. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2001. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/61475.
Bouchard, Kathy, et al. Anti-Icing Endurance Time Tests of Two Certified SAE Type I Aircraft Deicing Fluids. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2001, Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-01/13, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/61475.
Numerous advancements 1n aircraft deicing/anti-icing fluids, application methodologies, training, and deicing/anti-icing equipment have emerged in recent years; however, the undesirable effects of deicing fluid runoff on the environment remain a challenge. Although most proper disposal operations includes precise metering on the resultant deicing o
...
Kurowski, M. (2001). History, Processing, and Usage of Recycled Glycol for Aircraft Deicing and Anti-Icing (Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-00/55). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57472
Kurowski, Max. History, Processing, and Usage of Recycled Glycol for Aircraft Deicing and Anti-Icing. Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-00/55. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 2001. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57472.
Kurowski, Max History, Processing, and Usage of Recycled Glycol for Aircraft Deicing and Anti-Icing. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 2001, Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-00/55, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57472.
The efficacy of Computer-Based Training (CBT) programs, potentially useful for security checkpoint screener training, will be evaluated at three different airports. Candidates will be trained with one of three CBT programs or the Air Transport Association-approved classroom training program. The Screener Readiness Test, designed to assess screening
...
Klock, B. A., & Rubinstein, J. (2000). Revised Test and Evaluation Plan for Determining Screener Training Effectiveness (Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-00/53). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57323
Klock, Brenda A. and Joshua Rubinstein. Revised Test and Evaluation Plan for Determining Screener Training Effectiveness. Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-00/53. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 2000. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57323.
Klock, Brenda A., and Joshua Rubinstein Revised Test and Evaluation Plan for Determining Screener Training Effectiveness. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 2000, Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-00/53, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57323.
INTRODUCTION. Refractive surgical procedures performed in the United States have increased in recent years and continued growth is projected. Postoperative side effects can affect the quality of vision and may be unacceptable in a cockpit environment. The scientific literature suggests certain females (pregnant, menopausal, elderly) are more likely
...
Nakagawara, V. B., & Montgomery, R. W. (2000). Gender Differences in a Refractive Surgery Population of Civilian Aviators: Final Report (Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-00/23). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/15399
Nakagawara, Van B. and Ronald W. Montgomery. Gender Differences in a Refractive Surgery Population of Civilian Aviators: Final Report. Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-00/23. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2000. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/15399.
Nakagawara, Van B., and Ronald W. Montgomery Gender Differences in a Refractive Surgery Population of Civilian Aviators: Final Report. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2000, Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-00/23, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/15399.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration
...
2000-06-01
|
PDF
To assure consistency in agency planning, the Office of Aviation Policy and Plans provides an extension of its annual 12-year forecasts of aviation demand. Although forecast values are shown for specific years, year-to-year fluctuations are difficult to forecast precisely. Therefore, the projections reflect the trend of average conditions expected
...
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, & United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Policy and Plans (2000). FAA Long-Range Aerospace Forecasts: Fiscal Years 2015, 2020 and 2025 [June 2000] (Report No. FAA-APO-00-5). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58478
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration and United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Policy and Plans. FAA Long-Range Aerospace Forecasts: Fiscal Years 2015, 2020 and 2025 [June 2000]. Report no. FAA-APO-00-5. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2000. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58478.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, et al. FAA Long-Range Aerospace Forecasts: Fiscal Years 2015, 2020 and 2025 [June 2000]. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2000, Report no. FAA-APO-00-5, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58478.
This plan outlines a test of Threat Image Projection (TIP) validity. Airport security screens will evaluate whether fictional threat images (FTIs) are as realistic as actual threat images. The test will compare screener performance on real threat items, FTIs, and Combined Threat Images (CTIs). Performance measures will assess difference in hits, mi
...
Monichetti, S. B., & Snyder, M. D. (2000). Test and Evaluation Plan for the Laboratory Validation of X-ray Threat Image Projection (Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-00/43). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57324
Monichetti, Susan B. and Michael D. Snyder. Test and Evaluation Plan for the Laboratory Validation of X-ray Threat Image Projection. Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-00/43. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 2000. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57324.
Monichetti, Susan B., and Michael D. Snyder Test and Evaluation Plan for the Laboratory Validation of X-ray Threat Image Projection. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 2000, Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-00/43, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57324.
This Test and Evaluation Plan describes the evaluation process for comparing screener performance with Image Scan Holding's Axis-3D X-ray System and conventional X-ray machine technology. All data from this Test and Evaluation Plan will be published in a Test and Evaluation report.
Barrientos, J. M., & Snyder, M. D. (2000). Test and Evaluation Plan for Image Scan Holding's Axis-3D X-ray Machine (Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-00/23). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57321
Barrientos, J. Michael and Michael D. Snyder. Test and Evaluation Plan for Image Scan Holding's Axis-3D X-ray Machine. Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-00/23. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 2000. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57321.
Barrientos, J. Michael, and Michael D. Snyder Test and Evaluation Plan for Image Scan Holding's Axis-3D X-ray Machine. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 2000, Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-00/23, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57321.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. National Air Space (NAS) Operations Directorate
2000-04-01
|
PDF
The Fuchsia Book sets forth the telecommunications requirements, implementation strategies, and costs for leased telecommunications services and systems. It is the primary source for leased communications budget estimates. The Fuchsia Book is published by the Telecommunications Network Planning and Engineering Division (AOP-400) of the Office of th
...
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. National Air Space (NAS) Operations Directorate (2000). Federal Aviation Administration Future Telecommunications Plan: "Fuchsia Book" (Report No. DOT/FAA/AOP-400). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58105
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. National Air Space (NAS) Operations Directorate. Federal Aviation Administration Future Telecommunications Plan: "Fuchsia Book". Report no. DOT/FAA/AOP-400. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2000. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58105.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. National Air Space (NAS) Operations Directorate Federal Aviation Administration Future Telecommunications Plan: "Fuchsia Book". United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2000, Report no. DOT/FAA/AOP-400, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58105.
This Test and Evaluation Plan describes the evaluation process of dual-view x-ray technology. While a conventional Rapiscan X-ray machine presents only a top-down view of passenger baggage, their Dual View system presents both a top-down and a side view. Screener performance with this additional view will be compared to performance with only the co
...
Snyder, M. D., & Barrientos, J. M. (2000). Test and Evaluation Plan for the Rapiscan Dual View X-ray Machine (Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-00/21). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57326
Snyder, Michael D. and J. Michael Barrientos. Test and Evaluation Plan for the Rapiscan Dual View X-ray Machine. Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-00/21. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 2000. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57326.
Snyder, Michael D., and J. Michael Barrientos Test and Evaluation Plan for the Rapiscan Dual View X-ray Machine. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 2000, Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-00/21, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57326.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration
...
2000-03-01
|
PDF
This report contains the Fiscal Years 2000-2011 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) forecasts of aviation activity at FAA facilities. These include airports with FAA and contract control towers, air route traffic control centers, and flight service stat;See also AD-A322-723 (forecasts for FY's 1997 to 2008).;pg 300
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, & United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Policy and Plans (2000). FAA Aerospace Forecasts: Fiscal Years 2000-2011 (Report No. FAA-APO-00-1). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58463
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration and United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Policy and Plans. FAA Aerospace Forecasts: Fiscal Years 2000-2011. Report no. FAA-APO-00-1. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2000. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58463.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, et al. FAA Aerospace Forecasts: Fiscal Years 2000-2011. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 2000, Report no. FAA-APO-00-1, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58463.
This report summarizes Abacus Technology Corporation's experience in conducting risk/vulnerability assessments of airports in support of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airport Vulnerability Assessment and Analysis Project (AVAP). The report describes Abacus Technology's findings regarding application and effectiveness of the Risk Managem
...
Lazarick, R. T. (1999). Application of the FAATC Risk Management Process to the Airport Vulnerability Assessment and Analysis Project (AVAP) (Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-99/95). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58681
Lazarick, Richard T.. Application of the FAATC Risk Management Process to the Airport Vulnerability Assessment and Analysis Project (AVAP). Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-99/95. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 1999. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58681.
Lazarick, Richard T. Application of the FAATC Risk Management Process to the Airport Vulnerability Assessment and Analysis Project (AVAP). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 1999, Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-99/95, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58681.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration
...
1999-06-01
|
PDF
To assure consistency in agency planning, the Office of Aviation Policy and Plans provides an extension of its annual 12-year forecasts of aviation demand. Although forecast values are shown for specific years, year-to-year fluctuations are difficult to forecast precisely. Therefore, the projections reflect the trend of average conditions expected
...
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, & United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Policy and Plans (1999). FAA Long-Range Aerospace Forecasts: Fiscal Years 2015, 2020 and 2025 [June 1999] (Report No. FAA-APO-99-5). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58477
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration and United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Policy and Plans. FAA Long-Range Aerospace Forecasts: Fiscal Years 2015, 2020 and 2025 [June 1999]. Report no. FAA-APO-99-5. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 1999. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58477.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, et al. FAA Long-Range Aerospace Forecasts: Fiscal Years 2015, 2020 and 2025 [June 1999]. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 1999, Report no. FAA-APO-99-5, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58477.
This survey of no-glycol and low-glycol aircraft deicing practices, methods, and procedures used by the world's airlines, including cargo carriers, was conducted under contract to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) William J. Hughes Technical Center. A representative sample of 80 of the world's airlines and airports with operations under win
...
Cornish, J., & Eyre, F. (1999). Survey of Nonglycol and Reduced Glycol Aircraft Deicing Methods (Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-99/18). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57371
Cornish, Jeremy and Frank Eyre. Survey of Nonglycol and Reduced Glycol Aircraft Deicing Methods. Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-99/18. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 1999. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57371.
Cornish, Jeremy, and Frank Eyre Survey of Nonglycol and Reduced Glycol Aircraft Deicing Methods. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 1999, Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-99/18, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57371.
To predict crack growth and residual strengths of riveted joints subjected to widespread fatigue damage (WFD), accurate stress and fracture analyses of corner and surface cracks at a rivet hole are needed. The results present in this report focus on the calculation of stress-intensity factor (SIF) solutions for cracks at countersunk rivet holes for
...
Rahman, A., Bakuckas, J. J., Bigelow, C., & Tan, P. (1999). Boundary Correction Factors for Elliptic Surface Cracks Emanating from Countersunk Rivet Holes under Tension, Bending, and Wedge Loading Conditions (Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-98/37). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57526
Rahman, Anisur, John Jr. Bakuckas, Catherine Bigelow, and Paul Tan. Boundary Correction Factors for Elliptic Surface Cracks Emanating from Countersunk Rivet Holes under Tension, Bending, and Wedge Loading Conditions. Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-98/37. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 1999. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57526.
Rahman, Anisur, et al. Boundary Correction Factors for Elliptic Surface Cracks Emanating from Countersunk Rivet Holes under Tension, Bending, and Wedge Loading Conditions. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 1999, Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-98/37, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57526.
This Test and Evaluation Plan describes the evaluation of Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance Technology working in conjunction with Screener Assist Technology. The test will evaluate equipment detection and screener alarm resolution. Machine and system performance measure on detection and alarm resolution will be recorded, analyzed, and evaluated, with r
...
Monichetti, S. B., Barrientos, J. M., Fobes, J. L., Neiderman, E. C., & Fabry, D. (1999). Test and Evaluation Plan for Integrating X-ray Screener Assist Technology and Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance (Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-99/16). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57325
Monichetti, Susan B., J. Michael Barrientos, J. L. Fobes, Eric C. Neiderman, and David Fabry. Test and Evaluation Plan for Integrating X-ray Screener Assist Technology and Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance. Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-99/16. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 1999. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57325.
Monichetti, Susan B., et al. Test and Evaluation Plan for Integrating X-ray Screener Assist Technology and Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 1999, Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-99/16, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57325.
This report describes the work done to determine the effectiveness of various aerobic bioremediation techniques for reducing the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) of aircraft deicing fluid runoff. Primary emphasis has been placed on laboratory and field demonstrations of bioremediation systems using various combinations of inocula (bacteria), nutrien
...
Gallagher, D. W. (1998). Bioremediation of Aircraft Deicing Fluids (Glycol) at Airports (Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-97/81). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57521
Gallagher, Donald W.. Bioremediation of Aircraft Deicing Fluids (Glycol) at Airports. Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-97/81. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 1998. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57521.
Gallagher, Donald W. Bioremediation of Aircraft Deicing Fluids (Glycol) at Airports. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Research, 1998, Report no. DOT/FAA/AR-97/81, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57521.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration
...
1998-06-01
|
PDF
To assure consistency in agency planning, the Office of Aviation Policy and Plans provides an extension of its annual 12-year forecasts of aviation demand. Although forecast values are shown for specific years, year-to-year fluctuations are difficult to forecast precisely. Therefore, the projections reflect the trend of average conditions expected
...
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, & United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Policy and Plans (1998). FAA Long-Range Aerospace Forecasts: Fiscal Years 2010, 2015 and 2020 [June 1998] (Report No. FAA-APO-98-9). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58476
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration and United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation Policy and Plans. FAA Long-Range Aerospace Forecasts: Fiscal Years 2010, 2015 and 2020 [June 1998]. Report no. FAA-APO-98-9. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 1998. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58476.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, et al. FAA Long-Range Aerospace Forecasts: Fiscal Years 2010, 2015 and 2020 [June 1998]. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 1998, Report no. FAA-APO-98-9, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58476.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration
1997-12-18
|
PDF
Primary airport revenue passenger enplanement statistics for CY1991 through CY1996 by rank order of airport.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration (1997). Revenue Enplaned Passenger Activity from CY1989 to CY1996 (By Rank Order, Primary Airports for CY1996). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1404252
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Revenue Enplaned Passenger Activity from CY1989 to CY1996 (By Rank Order, Primary Airports for CY1996). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 1997. https://doi.org/10.21949/1404252.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration Revenue Enplaned Passenger Activity from CY1989 to CY1996 (By Rank Order, Primary Airports for CY1996). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 1997, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1404252.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration
1997-12-18
|
PDF
Lists, in rank order, reporting U.S. cargo airports in terms of all cargo activity (certificated gross landed weight of all cargo aircraft) from CY91-CY96.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration (1997). All-Cargo Activity from CY91 to CY96 (by Rank Order, Reporting Cargo Airports CY1996). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1402945
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. All-Cargo Activity from CY91 to CY96 (by Rank Order, Reporting Cargo Airports CY1996). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 1997. https://doi.org/10.21949/1402945.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration All-Cargo Activity from CY91 to CY96 (by Rank Order, Reporting Cargo Airports CY1996). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 1997, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1402945.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration
...
1997-12-18
|
PDF
Cargo carrier codes listed by name of carrier for CY1997.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, & United States. Department of Transportation (1997). Cargo Carrier Codes: Listed by Carrier Name. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1403289
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration and United States. Department of Transportation. Cargo Carrier Codes: Listed by Carrier Name. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 1997. https://doi.org/10.21949/1403289.
United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, et al. Cargo Carrier Codes: Listed by Carrier Name. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration, 1997, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1403289.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.