United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division
2010-12-01
|
PDF
No Description
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division (2010). Improving Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck Ergonomics to Reduce Fatigue and Improve Driver Health and Performance (Report No. FMCSA-RRR-10-010). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502720
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division. Improving Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck Ergonomics to Reduce Fatigue and Improve Driver Health and Performance. Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-010. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502720.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division Improving Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck Ergonomics to Reduce Fatigue and Improve Driver Health and Performance. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010, Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-010, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502720.
This report documents the Safety Measurement System (SMS) methodology developed to support the Comprehensive Safety Analysis 2010 (CSA 2010) Initiative for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). The SMS is one of the major tools for measuring the safety of individual motor carriers and Commercial Motor Vehicle (CMV) drivers. Such
...
Madsen, D. (2010). Comprehensive Safety Analysis 2010 Safety Measurement System (SMS) Methodology, Version 2.1 Revised December 2010. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502957
Madsen, David. Comprehensive Safety Analysis 2010 Safety Measurement System (SMS) Methodology, Version 2.1 Revised December 2010. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502957.
Madsen, David Comprehensive Safety Analysis 2010 Safety Measurement System (SMS) Methodology, Version 2.1 Revised December 2010. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502957.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division
2010-12-01
|
PDF
The objective of this research project was to determine the effectiveness of the 34-hour restart provision in the Hours-of-Service regulations governing property-carrying commercial motor vehicle drivers. A sample of 27 healthy subjects was studied in an in-residence laboratory study with frequent testing of cognitive performance and driving perfor
...
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division (2010). Investigation into Motor Carrier Practices to Achieve Optimal Commercial Motor Vehicle Driver Performance: Phase I (Report No. FMCSA-RRR-10-005). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502725
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division. Investigation into Motor Carrier Practices to Achieve Optimal Commercial Motor Vehicle Driver Performance: Phase I. Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-005. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502725.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division Investigation into Motor Carrier Practices to Achieve Optimal Commercial Motor Vehicle Driver Performance: Phase I. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010, Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-005, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502725.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division
2010-12-01
|
PDF
No Description
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division (2010). Data Analysis Reporting Team (DART) Summary Report for 2010. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502802
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division. Data Analysis Reporting Team (DART) Summary Report for 2010. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502802.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division Data Analysis Reporting Team (DART) Summary Report for 2010. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502802.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division
2010-12-01
|
PDF
No Description
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division (2010). Investigation into Motor Carrier Practices to Achieve Optimal CMV Driver Performance: Phase I (Report No. FMCSA-RRR-10-006). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502724
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division. Investigation into Motor Carrier Practices to Achieve Optimal CMV Driver Performance: Phase I. Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-006. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502724.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division Investigation into Motor Carrier Practices to Achieve Optimal CMV Driver Performance: Phase I. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010, Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-006, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502724.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division
2010-12-01
|
PDF
No Description
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division (2010). Duration Restart Period Needed to Recycle with Optimal Performance: Phase II, [Technical Brief] (Report No. FMCSA-RRR-10-062-TB). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502697
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division. Duration Restart Period Needed to Recycle with Optimal Performance: Phase II, [Technical Brief]. Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-062-TB. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502697.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division Duration Restart Period Needed to Recycle with Optimal Performance: Phase II, [Technical Brief]. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010, Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-062-TB, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502697.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division
2010-12-01
|
PDF
No Description
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division (2010). Duration of Restart Period Needed to Recycle with Optimal Performance: Phase II (Report No. FMCSA-MC-RRR-10-062). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502696
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division. Duration of Restart Period Needed to Recycle with Optimal Performance: Phase II. Report no. FMCSA-MC-RRR-10-062. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502696.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division Duration of Restart Period Needed to Recycle with Optimal Performance: Phase II. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010, Report no. FMCSA-MC-RRR-10-062, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502696.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division
2010-12-01
|
PDF
No Description
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division (2010). Improving Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck Ergonomics to Reduce Fatigue and Improve Driver Health and Performance [TechBrief] (Report No. FMCSA-RRR-10-010-TB). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502721
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division. Improving Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck Ergonomics to Reduce Fatigue and Improve Driver Health and Performance [TechBrief]. Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-010-TB. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502721.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division Improving Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck Ergonomics to Reduce Fatigue and Improve Driver Health and Performance [TechBrief]. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010, Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-010-TB, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502721.
This on-site investigation focused on the origin and severity of the fire that involved a 2007 Motor Coach Industries (MCI) motorcoach. The motorcoach was occupied by the 46-year-old male driver and 35 adult passengers while traveling at highway speeds on a divided roadway. Several of the passengers detected a significant jolt in the travel of the
...
Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center (2010). Calspan On-Site Motorcoach Fire Investigation; Vehicle: 2007 MCI Model D4505 Motorcoach; Location: State of Michigan (Report No. CA09068). Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/59755
Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center. Calspan On-Site Motorcoach Fire Investigation; Vehicle: 2007 MCI Model D4505 Motorcoach; Location: State of Michigan. Report no. CA09068. Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center, 2010. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/59755.
Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center Calspan On-Site Motorcoach Fire Investigation; Vehicle: 2007 MCI Model D4505 Motorcoach; Location: State of Michigan. Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center, 2010, Report no. CA09068, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/59755.
This on-site investigation focused on the origin and severity of a fire that involved a 2001 Motor Coach Industries (MCI) Model E4500 motorcoach. The motorcoach was occupied by the 58- year-old male driver and 38 adult passengers. The motorcoach was traveling southbound on an interstate roadway when a fire initiated in the back of the vehicle. The
...
Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center (2010). Calspan On-Site Motorcoach Fire Investigation Vehicle: 2001 Motor Coach Industries Model G4500 Location: State of Texas (Report No. CA10012). Calspan Corporation. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/73794
Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center. Calspan On-Site Motorcoach Fire Investigation Vehicle: 2001 Motor Coach Industries Model G4500 Location: State of Texas. Report no. CA10012. Calspan Corporation, 2010. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/73794.
Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center Calspan On-Site Motorcoach Fire Investigation Vehicle: 2001 Motor Coach Industries Model G4500 Location: State of Texas. Calspan Corporation, 2010, Report no. CA10012, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/73794.
This on-site investigation focused on the origin and severity of a fire that initiated in the drive axle area of an in-transit motorcoach. The motorcoach was a 1995 Motor Coach Industries (MCI) Model 102-DL3. The motorcoach had a 55-passenger capacity and was occupied by a male driver and 40 adult passengers at the time of the incident. While trave
...
Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center (2010). Calspan On-Site Motorcoach Fire Investigation; Vehicle: 1995 MCI Model 102-DL3; Location: State of Connecticut (Report No. DTNH22-07-C-00045). Calspan Corporation. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/73795
Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center. Calspan On-Site Motorcoach Fire Investigation; Vehicle: 1995 MCI Model 102-DL3; Location: State of Connecticut. Report no. DTNH22-07-C-00045. Calspan Corporation, 2010. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/73795.
Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center Calspan On-Site Motorcoach Fire Investigation; Vehicle: 1995 MCI Model 102-DL3; Location: State of Connecticut. Calspan Corporation, 2010, Report no. DTNH22-07-C-00045, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/73795.
This on-site investigation focused on the origin and severity of a fire that consumed a 2005 Motor Coach Industries (MCI) Model J4500 motorcoach. The vehicle was in-transit occupied by a 63-year-old male driver and 32 passengers consisting of 26 middle school students and six chaperones. The motorcoach was traveling westbound on an interstate roadw
...
Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center (2010). Calspan On-Site Motorcoach Fire Investigation; Vehicle: 2005 Motor Coach Industries (MCI) Model J4500; Location: State of Louisiana (Report No. CA10019). Calspan Corporation. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/59756
Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center. Calspan On-Site Motorcoach Fire Investigation; Vehicle: 2005 Motor Coach Industries (MCI) Model J4500; Location: State of Louisiana. Report no. CA10019. Calspan Corporation, 2010. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/59756.
Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center Calspan On-Site Motorcoach Fire Investigation; Vehicle: 2005 Motor Coach Industries (MCI) Model J4500; Location: State of Louisiana. Calspan Corporation, 2010, Report no. CA10019, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/59756.
This on-site investigation focused on the origin and severity of a fire that initiated in the engine compartment area of a 1990 MCI Model 102-C3 Motorcoach. The motorcoach was occupied by the male driver and 20 adult passengers ranging in age from 60-92 years of age. The driver was conducting a tour and was traveling at a slow speed in a cemetery.
...
Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center (2010). Calspan On-Site Motorcoach Fire Investigation; Vehicle: 1990 MCI Model 102-C3 Motorcoach; Location: State of Virginia (Report No. CA10028). Calspan Corporation. https://doi.org/10.21949/1530240
Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center. Calspan On-Site Motorcoach Fire Investigation; Vehicle: 1990 MCI Model 102-C3 Motorcoach; Location: State of Virginia. Report no. CA10028. Calspan Corporation, 2010. https://doi.org/10.21949/1530240.
Calspan Corporation. Crash Data Research Center Calspan On-Site Motorcoach Fire Investigation; Vehicle: 1990 MCI Model 102-C3 Motorcoach; Location: State of Virginia. Calspan Corporation, 2010, Report no. CA10028, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1530240.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division
2010-09-01
|
PDF
No Description
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division (2010). Distraction in Commercial Trucks and Buses: Assessing Prevalence and Risk in Conjunction with Crashes and Near-Crashes (Report No. FMCSA-RRR-10-049). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502693
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division. Distraction in Commercial Trucks and Buses: Assessing Prevalence and Risk in Conjunction with Crashes and Near-Crashes. Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-049. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502693.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division Distraction in Commercial Trucks and Buses: Assessing Prevalence and Risk in Conjunction with Crashes and Near-Crashes. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010, Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-049, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502693.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division
2010-09-01
|
PDF
The aim of this project was to use an existing naturalistic data set to document the prevalence and risk of commercial truck and bus drivers’ activities or actions that distract their attention away from the driving task. This naturalistic data set involved thousands of commercial motor vehicles (including trucks and buses) and provided a wealth of
...
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division (2010). Distraction in Commercial Trucks and Buses: Assessing Prevalence and Risk in Conjunction with Crashes and Near-Crashes [Tech Brief] (Report No. FMCSA-RRR-10-055). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502694
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division. Distraction in Commercial Trucks and Buses: Assessing Prevalence and Risk in Conjunction with Crashes and Near-Crashes [Tech Brief]. Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-055. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502694.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division Distraction in Commercial Trucks and Buses: Assessing Prevalence and Risk in Conjunction with Crashes and Near-Crashes [Tech Brief]. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010, Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-055, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502694.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division
2010-06-01
|
PDF
No Description
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division (2010). Evaluating the Safety Benefits of a Low-Cost Driving Behavior Management System in Commercial Vehicle Operations (Report) (Report No. FMCSA-RRR-10-032). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502703
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division. Evaluating the Safety Benefits of a Low-Cost Driving Behavior Management System in Commercial Vehicle Operations (Report). Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-032. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502703.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division Evaluating the Safety Benefits of a Low-Cost Driving Behavior Management System in Commercial Vehicle Operations (Report). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010, Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-032, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502703.
The study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 compares the safety performance of agricultural and non-agricultural carriers for the period 2005 through 2008, and also examines two additional industries: livestock and utility carriers, whose operations were not exempt from Hours Of Service (HOS) regulations prior to the 2005 passage of SAFETEA-LU.
...
Lacombe, A., Piccolo, D., Khan, M., & Bannister, W. (2010). Agricultural Commodity and Utility Carriers Hours of Service Exemption Analysis (Report No. FMCSA-RRA-10-048). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1503011
Lacombe, Annalynn, Dennis Piccolo, Mokbul Khan, and William Bannister. Agricultural Commodity and Utility Carriers Hours of Service Exemption Analysis. Report no. FMCSA-RRA-10-048. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010. https://doi.org/10.21949/1503011.
Lacombe, Annalynn, et al. Agricultural Commodity and Utility Carriers Hours of Service Exemption Analysis. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010, Report no. FMCSA-RRA-10-048, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1503011.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division
2010-04-01
|
PDF
This project provides an independent evaluation of a commercially available low-cost driving behavior management system. Participating drivers from two carriers (identified as Carrier A and Carrier B) drove an instrumented vehicle for 17 consecutive weeks while they made their normal, revenue-producing deliveries. During the 4-week baseline phase,
...
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division (2010). Evaluating the Safety Benefits of a Low-Cost Driving Behavior Management System in Commercial Vehicle Operations (Report No. FMCSA-RRR-10-033). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502702
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division. Evaluating the Safety Benefits of a Low-Cost Driving Behavior Management System in Commercial Vehicle Operations. Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-033. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502702.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Technology Division Evaluating the Safety Benefits of a Low-Cost Driving Behavior Management System in Commercial Vehicle Operations. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010, Report no. FMCSA-RRR-10-033, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502702.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division
2010-03-01
|
PDF
This annual edition of Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts contains descriptive statistics about fatal, injury, andproperty damage only crashes involving large trucks and buses in 2008. Selected crash statistics on passengervehicles are also presented for comparison purposes
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division (2010). Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts 2008 (Report No. FMCSA-RRA-10-043). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502813
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division. Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts 2008. Report no. FMCSA-RRA-10-043. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502813.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts 2008. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010, Report no. FMCSA-RRA-10-043, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502813.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division
2010-03-01
|
PDF
No Description
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division (2010). Large Truck Crash Overview 2008 (Report No. FMCSA-RRA-10-004). United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502795
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division. Large Truck Crash Overview 2008. Report no. FMCSA-RRA-10-004. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502795.
United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Analysis Division Large Truck Crash Overview 2008. United States. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2010, Report no. FMCSA-RRA-10-004, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1502795.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.