Alternative surveillance technology for the Gulf of Mexico
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


Alternative surveillance technology for the Gulf of Mexico

Filetype[PDF-592.13 KB]

  • English

  • Details:

    • Resource Type:
    • Geographical Coverage:
    • Abstract:
      In the Gulf of Mexico, there are two major operating aviation users: low altitude offshore and high altitude. The low altitude offshore operators are primarily helicopter fleets supporting the oil and gas exploration efforts; their traffic typically consists of 5,000 to 6,000 flights per day, most under one hour in duration. In the high altitude regime, over 300 oceanic flights pass through the Gulf of Mexico. Offshore surveillance coverage in the Gulf of Mexico is currently limited due to remote, over-water operations. Implementation of primary or secondary radar to support surveillance coverage in the Gulf of Mexico is technically and economically difficult. Air traffic between the United States and destinations in the Caribbean, Mexico, and Central America has grown at a rate of over 8% per year over the last 12 years. Currently, flights that transit the Central Gulf of Mexico are subjected to oceanic separation standards in part because of a lack of direct pilot-controller communications, standardized aircraft navigation requirements, and limitations to radar surveillance. Air traffic traversing the Gulf of Mexico often must choose between accepting a ground delay, a re-route, or a less fuel-efficient altitude. An estimated 40% of the traffic in the non-radar airspace may not receive their requested altitude or route. However, if seamless surveillance and communication coverage were implemented in the Gulf of Mexico, aircraft separation standards may be reduced from the current oceanic standards to domestic EnRoute standards, thus reducing delays and improving aircraft safety.
    • Format:
    • Collection(s):
    • Main Document Checksum:
    • File Type:

    Supporting Files

    • No Additional Files

    More +

    You May Also Like

    Checkout today's featured content at

    Version 3.26