Johnson, M. (2025). Who’s to Blame for E-Scooter Collisions?: An Analysis of the Language Used in E-Scooter Collision Reporting (Report No. UCLA ITS-LA2523). University of California, Los Angeles. Institute of Transportation Studies. https://doi.org/10.17610/T6FS5X
Johnson, Milena. Who’s to Blame for E-Scooter Collisions?: An Analysis of the Language Used in E-Scooter Collision Reporting. Report no. UCLA ITS-LA2523. University of California, Los Angeles. Institute of Transportation Studies, 2025. https://doi.org/10.17610/T6FS5X.
Johnson, Milena Who’s to Blame for E-Scooter Collisions?: An Analysis of the Language Used in E-Scooter Collision Reporting. University of California, Los Angeles. Institute of Transportation Studies, 2025, Report no. UCLA ITS-LA2523, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.17610/T6FS5X.
The growing popularity of electric scooters (e-scooters) in urban environments has led to increased media coverage on their perceived danger both to the rider and to other users of the roadway. Media surrounding traffic collisions has long been criticized by safety researchers and activists for implicitly assigning blame to more vulnerable road users through the passive voice, and through framing roadway deaths as tragic accidents, rather than a systemic public health issue. In this paper, I analyzed recent news articles on e-scooter collisions in the United States to determine how e-scooters, a relatively new form of mobility, are described in collision narratives. Most articles discussing e-scooter collisions with vehicle drivers used the passive voice to remove explicit blame but used the active voice when describing a collision between an e-scooter and a pedestrian. This pattern indicates a continued motor vehicle bias in social conceptions of traffic collisions and a potential new bias towards e-scooter riders.
Johnson, M. (2025). Who’s to Blame for E-Scooter Collisions?: An Analysis of the Language Used in E-Scooter Collision Reporting (Report No. UCLA ITS-LA2523). University of California, Los Angeles. Institute of Transportation Studies. https://doi.org/10.17610/T6FS5X
Johnson, Milena. Who’s to Blame for E-Scooter Collisions?: An Analysis of the Language Used in E-Scooter Collision Reporting. Report no. UCLA ITS-LA2523. University of California, Los Angeles. Institute of Transportation Studies, 2025. https://doi.org/10.17610/T6FS5X.
Johnson, Milena Who’s to Blame for E-Scooter Collisions?: An Analysis of the Language Used in E-Scooter Collision Reporting. University of California, Los Angeles. Institute of Transportation Studies, 2025, Report no. UCLA ITS-LA2523, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.17610/T6FS5X.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.