Pilch, M. (2024). Assessing the Concepts of Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty for FAA Aircraft Seat Certification (Report No. DOR/FAA/24/17). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute. https://doi.org/10.21949/1529682
Pilch, Martin. Assessing the Concepts of Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty for FAA Aircraft Seat Certification. Report no. DOR/FAA/24/17. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2024. https://doi.org/10.21949/1529682.
Pilch, Martin Assessing the Concepts of Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty for FAA Aircraft Seat Certification. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2024, Report no. DOR/FAA/24/17, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1529682.
This report synthesizes a process for Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty (BEPU) based on lessons learned from the United States (US) Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the US Nuclear Weapons Community, and the emerging Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification (VVUQ) communities. BEPU supports Certification by Analysis (CbA). BEPU is characterized by an unbiased and objective accounting of all dominant contributors to the uncertainty that informs regulatory decisions. Predictions for untested designs must be bias-corrected for errors in the simulation computational model and model form, and uncertainties in both must be quantified to support regulatory decisions. The process is demonstrated for emergency landing conditions with an application to aircraft seat certification for lumbar injuries. The demonstration includes the steps necessary for certification, identifies what testing is needed, and shows how the model can be accepted. The report discusses four regulatory options for dealing with uncertainties that balance risk tolerance with the maturity of assessment capabilities.
Pilch, M. (2024). Assessing the Concepts of Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty for FAA Aircraft Seat Certification (Report No. DOR/FAA/24/17). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute. https://doi.org/10.21949/1529682
Pilch, Martin. Assessing the Concepts of Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty for FAA Aircraft Seat Certification. Report no. DOR/FAA/24/17. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2024. https://doi.org/10.21949/1529682.
Pilch, Martin Assessing the Concepts of Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty for FAA Aircraft Seat Certification. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2024, Report no. DOR/FAA/24/17, ROSA P. https://doi.org/10.21949/1529682.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.