Skew Detection System Replacement on Vertical Lift Bridges (Phase 2) [Technical Summary]
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Skew Detection System Replacement on Vertical Lift Bridges (Phase 2) [Technical Summary]

Filetype[PDF-506.65 KB]


English
Details Related Documents You May Also Like

Details:

  • Creators:
    Rees, Gareth
  • Corporate Creators:
    Louisiana Transportation Research Center
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
    LTRC Report 703
  • Resource Type:
    Brief
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Edition:
    Technical Summary
  • Contracting Officer:
    Alaywan, Walid
  • Corporate Publisher:
    Louisiana. Department of Transportation and Development
  • Abstract:
    A potential vulnerability of a tower drive vertical lift bridge is a failure to maintain level operation over the length or width of its movable span; this is known as longitudinal or transverse skew, respectively. When either of these conditions occurs, they can cause the movable span to jam in its guides; without adequate protection, this can lead to a catastrophic bridge failure. Vertical lift tower drive skew indication and monitoring has historically used a differential synchro (i.e., differential Selsyn) system. However, this technology is now considered obsolete, and replacements are difficult to obtain. A study was commissioned to evaluate alternatives to the differential Selsyn system. These alternatives were selected based on several criteria, including their availability, ease of maintenance and replacement, and minimization of the use of advanced electronic equipment. This report summarizes Phase 2 of the study. In this phase, several alternative skew detection methods were field-tested and evaluated. Based on the results of this evaluation, an alternative to the differential Selsyn system was selected to provide the required skew monitoring, indication, and operating system protection. The considered alternative systems included the use of direct skew measurement using an inclinometer and indirect skew measurement using encoders. To minimize maintenance and mean-time-to-repair, as well as limit dependency on PLC systems, consideration for the deployment of these alternative methods included the use of SMART relays with self-diagnostics that can be replaced easily in the event of a malfunction.
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Funding:
    SIO No. DOTLT1000428, LTRC Project No. 22-2ST, SPR: TT-Fed/TT-Reg - 5
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

Related Documents

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov