Using Public Engagement to Respond to Community Needs and Priorities: Rethinking I-94 and Reconnecting Communities in the Twin Cities
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Using Public Engagement to Respond to Community Needs and Priorities: Rethinking I-94 and Reconnecting Communities in the Twin Cities

Filetype[PDF-340.49 KB]


English

Details:

  • Corporate Creators:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Right Statement:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    In the 1960s, during a major national expansion of the United States Interstate Highway System, the Minnesota Highway Department (now Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT)) routed I-94 through the heart of the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota. As was the case in many cities where construction of an interstate highway and existing neighborhoods came into conflict, the process did not accommodate all communities equitably. One such community impacted by the construction of I-94 was the predominantly Black neighborhood of Rondo in St. Paul. In the 1940s, nearly 90 percent of Saint Paul’s Black population lived in Rondo, making it one of the largest Black enclaves in the Midwest.1 Despite community opposition to the highway, the Rondo community and dozens of others were divided by I-94. This action displaced hundreds of residents and businesses, disrupted social cohesion, reduced residents’ ability to walk and bike, and initiated a period of economic and social decline for the community. These planning decisions also have resulted in residents’ general distrust of road projects in underserved communities along the I-94 corridor. In 2015, Commissioner Charles Zelle of the MnDOT offered an official apology and acknowledgement for the unfair planning, project development, and delivery practices which devastated Rondo and other communities like it.
  • Format:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov