Mitigating Crash Risks in Work Zones: Causal Inference and Crash Modification Factors
-
2024-07-30
Details:
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:Carnegie Mellon University. Traffic21 Institute. Safety21 University Transportation Center (UTC) ; United States. Department of Transportation. University Transportation Centers (UTC) Program ; United States. Department of Transportation. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Contracting Officer:
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:In the U.S., a work zone crash occurred every five minutes during 2015 – 2019. It is still unclear the causes of those crashes, such as work zone configurations, weather conditions, work zone duration, and roadway characteristics. The causal impact of those potential factors to work zone crashes may vary substantially cross different types of roads and traffic flow characteristics. Agencies have been working on mitigating work zone crash risk by implementing work zone countermeasures, such as increasing work zone duration, left-hand merge, downstream lane shift, increasing the inside shoulder width, and two-way two-lane operations. The effectiveness of such countermeasures is typically evaluated by a Crash Modification Factor (referred to as CMF throughout this proposal), and more generally, Crash Modification Functions. To this end, crash modification factors (CMF) are typically unknown for work zones. For example, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control De- vices (MUTCD) provides qualitative recommendations of signs, flaggers, or closure settings for work zones with different characteristics, but no quantitative CMFunctions. FHWA CMF clearinghouse only provides the CMFunctions for implementing left-hand merge and downstream lane shift in rural areas, and modifying shoulder width in urban areas. It is critical to understand the root causes of work zone crashes and propose effective strategies to reduce crash occurrences. This project will continue the work zone safety analysis models developed by CMU Mobility Data Analytics Center, by extending to a full set of all potential causal factors and deploying the models to a number of state agencies (e.g., PA, MD, CA). Based on the models, the team will also establish a systematic approach to estimate the CMF for work zones under various roadway and work zone characteristics. In addition, an online web-based traffic safety analysis tool for selected deployment partners will be developed. Up-to-date safety data from various data providers can be acquired, archived and analyzed to enhance the web application over time. The safety data providers include State and local agencies, Police Department, Waze, and other private data sources (such as INRIX and TomTom). The team will integrate and analyze large-scale crash and incident data, and developed an online tool to visualize and forecast crash types, frequencies and severity for an actual or hypothetical work zone deployments on each road segment, along with mitigating strategies for agencies’ decision making. This research is based upon funded research ‘Mobility Data Analytics Center’ in the years of 2016-2023, with the focus on data-driven safety analysis and improvement. In the past two years, the research team has started building a data engine and a prototype web application to demonstrate the feasibility of multi-source data-driven decision making for state DOTs. The research team started from the PA where they have close partnerships with many local entities, and have successfully applied their data analytics tools in several case studies. The research team's intension in this project is to update the safety analysis models for both PA and MD (possible for CA too), and develop Crash Modification Factors specifically for work zones on state owned roads, which fills the gap that CMFs were rigorously developed for roads without active construction projects. First, the research team will implement a rigorous causal inference model (from MAC’s prior research studies) to infer the causal effect of work zones on crash risk across different work zone configurations, roadway functional classifications, weather conditions, and traffic conditions. The causal forest model avoids potential spurious heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) by systematically identifying the heterogeneity of treatment effects. In addition, the developed method incorporates the causal forest method with the fixed-effect variable representing road segments to mitigate the unobserved confounding bias in work zone safety studies.
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type: