United States Department of Transportation
i
Modifying Existing Asphalt Mix Design Procedures for RAP/RAS Surface Mixtures
-
2023-08-01
[PDF-3.33 MB]
Details:
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Edition:Final Report January 1, 2021 – August 15, 2023
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:The NCDOT mixture design procedure assumes 100 percent of the binder contained within reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) is available for blending with virgin asphalt. However, the literature shows that this assumption is flawed due to the presence of recycled asphalt material (RAM) agglomerations that prevent complete recycled binder availability (RBA). As a result, RAM mixtures designed using current practices may suffer from an inadequate amount of virgin asphalt, rendering them susceptible to cracking. Furthermore, past research highlights significant variability in the rheological properties of RAP and RAS stockpiles across North Carolina. Correspondingly, the objectives of this study were to: (1) modify the NCDOT’s procedures for the design of surface mixtures containing RAP and RAS to improve performance, and (2) modify the NCDOT’s current specifications to improve the consistency of RAP and RAS mixtures. To meet these objectives, a literature review was conducted that identified two approaches for addressing partial RBA in mixture design: the corrected optimum asphalt content (COAC) method specified by Georgia DOT and the availability adjusted mixture design method (AAMD) developed in NCDOT RP 2019-21. A review of plant operations was conducted to identify the range of RAP and RAS management and characterization processes in the state and select six plants to include in the experimental plan. ‘Control’ mixture designs were then identified from each of the selected plants for evaluation. The control mixtures correspond to approved Job Mix Formulas (JMFs) and thus, reflect mixture designs prepared according to current NCDOT practices. The control mixture designs were redesigned according to the COAC and AAMD approaches. The performance of the control and redesigned mixtures were evaluated through laboratory testing and pavement performance simulations. The COAC and AAMD methods produced mixtures with enhanced cracking performance compared to control mixtures. The COAC approach yielded negative consequences on asphalt mixture rutting susceptibility compared to the current practice. In contrast, the AAMD method, which addresses the role of RAM agglomerations on both RBA and aggregate structure, resulted in rut depths similar to the respective control mixtures for mixtures prepared with fixed RAP content. Consequently, the research team recommends that the NCDOT consider adopting the AAMD method for designing surface mixtures.
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
