Evaluation of Recycled Bituminous Pavements
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Evaluation of Recycled Bituminous Pavements

Filetype[PDF-2.38 MB]


English

Details:

  • Alternative Title:
    Recycling Asphalt Pavements, Elkhart County, Indiana
  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Corporate Contributors:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • Geographical Coverage:
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • Abstract:
    The study was initiated to evaluate the performance of recycled bituminous material as the base course of reconstructed county roads. The cold recycling process has been used in recent years by Elkhart County, Indiana to upgrade sections of distressed roads. The evaluation is based on a comparison of the material from laboratory extraction and gradation tests and the pavement structure from Dynaflect tests before and after treatment. Dynaflect tests and PCA Roadmeter tests were also run six, eight, eleven, and seventeen months after construction to evaluate the performance of the recycled pavement under traffic. Gradation results indicate that the before and after treatment material is very similar. An excess of asphalt was present in the treated material. Also, the gradations both before and after were quite dense and both indicated a deficiency of material greater than 1/2". Considerable variability was noticed relative to gradation and asphalt content indicating that the processed material was not homogeneous. The Dynaflect parameters developed from tests on the treated material verified the lack of uniformity. A simple comparative cost analysis clearly shows the cold recycling process is significantly less expensive than the hot mixed, hot placed material. In this study the cost in place of a plant mixed base such as Indiana's HAC #5 Base was three times more than the recycled material.
  • Format:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov