United States Department of Transportation
i
Human Factors Aspects of the Transfer of Control from the Automated Highway System to the Driver
-
1995-07-01
-
[PDF-2.41 MB]
Details:
-
Creators:
-
Corporate Creators:
-
Contributors:
-
Corporate Contributors:
-
Subject/TRT Terms:
-
Publication/ Report Number:
-
Resource Type:
-
Geographical Coverage:
-
Corporate Publisher:
-
Abstract:The first two experiments in a series exploring human factors issues related to the Automated Highway System (AHS) used a generic AHS configuration--the left lane reserved for automated vehicles, the center and right lanes containing unautomated vehicles, no transition lane, and no barriers between the automated and unautomated lanes--that was simulated in the Iowa Driving Simulator (IDS). The IDS has a moving base hexapod platform containing a mid-sized sedan. Imagery was projected onto a 3.35-rad (180 deg) screen in front of the driver, and onto a 1.13-rad (60 deg) screen to the rear. Thirty-six drivers between the ages of 25 and 34 years participated in the first experiment; 24 drivers who were age 65 or older took part in the second. Both experiments explored the transfer of control from the AHS to the driver when the driver's task was to leave the automated lane. The driver, who was traveling under automated control in a string of vehicles in the automated lane, had to take control, drive from the automated lane into the center lane, then leave the freeway. Results were as follows: (1) The mean time to respond to an "Exit" advisory decreased from 13.41 s to 10.16 s as the design velocity increased from 104.7 km/h (65 mi/h) to 153.0 km/h (95 mi/h). (2) After the transfer of control, the driver remained in the automated lane, decelerating until the velocity was slow enough to allow a safe transition into the slower traffic in the unautomated lanes. It took longer to decelerate (13.19 s vs. 10.26 s) and the exit velocity dropped [105.30 km/h (65.40 mi/h) vs. 99.54 km/h (61.83 mi/h)] as the unautomated traffic density decreased from 12.42 v/km/ln (20 v/mi/ln) to 6.21 v/km/ln (10 v/mi/ln). It also took longer to decelerate (15.23 s vs. 8.62 s) and the extent of the deceleration decreased [42.7 km/h (26.49 mi/h) vs. 13.18 km/h (8.16 mi/h)] as the design velocity decreased from 153.0 km/h (95 mi/h) to 104.7 km/h (65 mi/h). (3) Once in the unautomated lanes, the younger drivers were in the center lane 70% longer than the older drivers. (4) The vehicle immediately behind the driver's vehicle in the automated lane was delayed after control was transferred--the delay increased from 1.36 s to 6.70 s as the design velocity increased from 104.7 km/h (65 mi/h) to 153 km/h (95 mi/h). (5) Allowing for the delay times obtained in these experiments, it was determined that the potential capacity of an automated lane should increase from 634.6 v/h to 2087.8 v/h as the design velocity decreases from 153.0 km/h (95 mi/h) to 104.7 km/h (65 mi/h). (6) Collisions and incursions occurred at unacceptably high rates. (7) The responses to the questionnaire suggest that the drivers were receptive to the AHS concept.
-
Format:
-
Funding:
-
Collection(s):
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
