Analysis and testing of Koornstra-type induced exposure models
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Analysis and testing of Koornstra-type induced exposure models

Filetype[PDF-1.91 MB]


English

Details:

  • Creators:
  • Corporate Creators:
  • Subject/TRT Terms:
  • Publication/ Report Number:
  • Resource Type:
  • OCLC Number:
    173447379
  • Corporate Publisher:
  • NTL Classification:
    NTL-SAFETY AND SECURITY-SAFETY AND SECURITY;NTL-SAFETY AND SECURITY-Human Factors;
  • Abstract:
    Induced exposure models postulate a structure for accident data which permits the

    estimation of two factors: exposure and proneness. Since information on exposure

    is needed in order to assess the accident risk of different driver, vehicle, and

    environmental situations and since reliable exposure data is expensive to collect,

    induced exposure models hold the promise of a rich exposure data source which is

    perfectly matched to the accident data to be analyzed. This paper assesses the

    validity of the postulated structure of one induced exposure model: the Koornstra

    Model. The Koornstra Model was chosen for analysis and testing because it

    appeared to have the most potential for usefulness based on :

    a) previously reported favorable results (in limited testing);

    b) universal applicability;

    c) damaging criticism of certain other models; and

    d) a rich and well posed model structure.

    This paper analyses and tests the Koornstra Model from three different points of

    view:

    1) Is it based on reasonable assumptions?

    2) Does the model provide a significantly better fit to accident data than

    a simpler model which does not permit exposure or proneness to be

    estimated?

    3) How do the exposure estimates provided by the model compare with

    those from externally collected data?

  • Format:
  • Alternate URL:
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at rosap.ntl.bts.gov