Broach, D. (2004). Methodological Issues in the Study of Airplane Accident Rates by Pilot Age: Effects of Accident and Pilot Inclusion Criteria and Analytic Strategy (Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-04/8). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58228
Broach, Dana. Methodological Issues in the Study of Airplane Accident Rates by Pilot Age: Effects of Accident and Pilot Inclusion Criteria and Analytic Strategy. Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-04/8. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2004. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58228.
Broach, Dana Methodological Issues in the Study of Airplane Accident Rates by Pilot Age: Effects of Accident and Pilot Inclusion Criteria and Analytic Strategy. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2004, Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-04/8, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58228.
At the direction of the U.S. Senate, Broach, Schroeder, and Joseph (2000a, b) examined accident rates by age for professional air transport and commercial pilots using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) approach. As an extension of that work, this report focuses on methodological issues requiring careful consideration and definition in any analysis of aviation accident rates by pilot age. Three methodological issues are considered: (a) accident inclusion criteria; (b) pilot inclusion criteria; and (c) analytic strategy. Previous studies are interpreted with respect to these issues, and an additional analysis is presented to illustrate the impact of methodological choices on study outcomes. Overall, the comparisons and additional analysis indicate that accident and pilot inclusion criteria and analytic strategy have substantial impact on study outcomes. Recommendations are presented for future studies of the relationship of pilot age to aviation accidents.
Broach, D. (2004). Methodological Issues in the Study of Airplane Accident Rates by Pilot Age: Effects of Accident and Pilot Inclusion Criteria and Analytic Strategy (Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-04/8). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58228
Broach, Dana. Methodological Issues in the Study of Airplane Accident Rates by Pilot Age: Effects of Accident and Pilot Inclusion Criteria and Analytic Strategy. Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-04/8. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2004. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58228.
Broach, Dana Methodological Issues in the Study of Airplane Accident Rates by Pilot Age: Effects of Accident and Pilot Inclusion Criteria and Analytic Strategy. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2004, Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-04/8, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58228.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.