Farmer, W. L., Thompson, R. C., Heil, S. K. R., & Heil, M. C. (2001). Latent Trait Theory Analysis of Changes in Item Response Anchors (Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-01/4). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57918
Farmer, W. L., R. C. Thompson, S. K. R. Heil, and M. C. Heil. Latent Trait Theory Analysis of Changes in Item Response Anchors. Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-01/4. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2001. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57918.
Farmer, W. L., et al. Latent Trait Theory Analysis of Changes in Item Response Anchors. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2001, Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-01/4, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57918.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect that modifications in item response anchors have on responses to survey items. Twenty-nine items were administered in 1993 and 1995 as part of more extensive attitude surveys to two random samples of Federal Aviation Administration employees. Changes in the response scales (5-point Likert) between the two survey administrations ranged from no change at all to extensive re-anchoring of the response categories. Item responses were modeled via two-parameter graded response models based on item response theory. Changes in the way the item responses functioned between both years were assessed using the differential item functioning (DIF) method recommended by Muraki (1997). Twenty-four of the 29 items displayed significant levels of DIF, indicating that the response categories did not measure the constructs of interest in a similar fashion across the two administrations. Items whose response anchors had been changed substantially exhibited significant DIF more frequently than those where the change in anchors was less drastic. These results suggest that researchers and practitioners take a conservative.
Farmer, W. L., Thompson, R. C., Heil, S. K. R., & Heil, M. C. (2001). Latent Trait Theory Analysis of Changes in Item Response Anchors (Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-01/4). United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57918
Farmer, W. L., R. C. Thompson, S. K. R. Heil, and M. C. Heil. Latent Trait Theory Analysis of Changes in Item Response Anchors. Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-01/4. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2001. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57918.
Farmer, W. L., et al. Latent Trait Theory Analysis of Changes in Item Response Anchors. United States. Department of Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Office of Aviation. Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, 2001, Report no. DOT/FAA/AM-01/4, ROSA P. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/57918.
ROSA P serves as an archival repository of USDOT-published products including scientific
findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by
USDOT or funded partners. As a repository, ROSA P retains documents in their original published format to
ensure public access to scientific information.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving a Bureau of Transportation
Statistics (BTS)/National Transportation Library (NTL)
Web-based service.
Thank you for visiting.
You are about to access a non-government link outside of
the U.S. Department of Transportation's National
Transportation Library.
Please note: While links to Web sites outside of DOT are
offered for your convenience, when you exit DOT Web sites,
Federal privacy policy and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation
Act (accessibility requirements) no longer apply. In
addition, DOT does not attest to the accuracy, relevance,
timeliness or completeness of information provided by linked
sites. Linking to a Web site does not constitute an
endorsement by DOT of the sponsors of the site or the
products presented on the site. For more information, please
view DOT's Web site linking policy.
To get back to the page you were previously viewing, click
your Cancel button.